{
  "id": 8627635,
  "name": "R. L. BRIGHT v. NOAH BRIGHT",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bright v. Bright",
  "decision_date": "1947-09-24",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "704",
  "last_page": "704",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "227 N.C. 704"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 978,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.458,
    "sha256": "22848b26a9af826551323facb79385b249c4061a38048b36d7f9f823169c9301",
    "simhash": "1:222b444e6254e079",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:20:04.384970+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "R. L. BRIGHT v. NOAH BRIGHT."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nIt may be that, on this record, defendant\u2019s plea of res judicata is sufficient to sustain the judgment below. This we need not decide, for a careful examination of the record fails to disclose any evidence tending to show that plaintiff suffered his loss as a proximate result of actionable negligence of the defendant. For that reason the judgment below is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. W. Jennette and B. Cl\u00e1reme Dozier for plaintiff appellant.",
      "John H. Hall for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "R. L. BRIGHT v. NOAH BRIGHT.\n(Filed 24 September, 1947.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Burgwyn, Special Judge, at May Term, 1947, of PasquotaNK.\nAffirmed.\nCivil action to recover damages resulting from a fire alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, in which the defendant denies negligence and pleads a judgment of nonsuit entered in a former action on the same cause of action as res judicata and in bar.\nThere was a judgment of nonsuit to which plaintiff excepted and appealed.\nJ. W. Jennette and B. Cl\u00e1reme Dozier for plaintiff appellant.\nJohn H. Hall for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0704-01",
  "first_page_order": 752,
  "last_page_order": 752
}