{
  "id": 8628637,
  "name": "STATE v. ADAM DICKEY and BRITT LOGAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dickey",
  "decision_date": "1947-10-08",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "788",
  "last_page": "789",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "228 N.C. 788"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1816,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.5330875625009783e-08,
      "percentile": 0.28436078705746937
    },
    "sha256": "a2265892e071bc8134064f5b981ee2331efcab663d5f3d07ebdc937ebe6f08f4",
    "simhash": "1:a3d8000a5204c27e",
    "word_count": 298
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:52:37.324265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ADAM DICKEY and BRITT LOGAN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee CubiaM.\nThe only error assigned on this appeal is refusal of the court to grant motions of defendants for judgments as of nonsuit.\nIn this connection, no useful purpose will be served by a recitation of the evidence. However, after careful consideration of all the evidence offered on the trial below, as shown in the case on appeal, we are of opinion that the evidence is of sufficient import to take the ease to the jury, and to support the verdicts rendered. Hence, in the judgments below we find\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee CubiaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Atlorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes and Moody for the State.",
      "Hamrick & Hamrick for defendants, appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ADAM DICKEY and BRITT LOGAN.\n(Filed 8 October, 1947.)\nAppeal by defendants from Pless, J., at May Term, 1947, of Buther-EORD.\nCriminal prosecution upon two indictments charging that defendants \u201cdid unlawfully, willfully and feloniously assault\u201d two certain female persons and \u201cdid feloniously attempt to ravish and carnally know, forcibly and against her will,\u201d etc.\nUpon tbe trial in Superior Court at tbe close of tbe State\u2019s evidence each of defendants moved for judgment as of nonsuit. As to defendant Adam Dickey, motion is denied. As to defendant Britt Logan, motion is allowed as to tbe charge of assault witb intent to commit rape, but is denied upon tbe charge of an assault on a female.\nThereupon, defendants offered evidence, and each of them renewed motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence. Motions were denied, and each defendant excepts.\nVerdict: As to Adam Dickey \u2014 Guilty of assault with intent to commit rape. As to Britt Logan \u2014 Guilty of an assault on a female.\nJudgment: As to each defendant \u2014 Imprisonment as specified respectively.\nDefendants each appeal therefrom to Supreme Court and assign error.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Atlorneys-General Bruton, Rhodes and Moody for the State.\nHamrick & Hamrick for defendants, appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0788-01",
  "first_page_order": 834,
  "last_page_order": 835
}