{
  "id": 8628325,
  "name": "STATE v. HAROLD JACK GILBERT",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Gilbert",
  "decision_date": "1949-03-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "64",
  "last_page": "65",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "230 N.C. 64"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "196 N.C. 64",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8624011
      ],
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "144"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0064-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 172,
    "char_count": 1903,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.762513372103855e-08,
      "percentile": 0.49520609116593284
    },
    "sha256": "b551009efcf54131507dc9440e51b5b1aea1960a409302f78a50b0cfcedf6d86",
    "simhash": "1:97f53a5cca3818be",
    "word_count": 308
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:13.210119+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HAROLD JACK GILBERT."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Stacy, O. J.\nThe following excerpt from the charge constitutes one of defendant\u2019s exceptive assignments of error:\n\u201cThe court charges you if he willfully failed to provide her with adequate support after leaving her at her father\u2019s house and you so find from the evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt, your verdict would be guilty.\u201d\nIt will be noted that the element of willful abandonment is omitted from this instruction. The defendant is charged with a violation of G.S. 14-322, which provides that \u201cIf any husband shall wilfully abandon his wife without providing adequate support for such wife, etc., he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.\u201d The challenged instruction, therefore, was inadequate and necessitates another hearing. S. v. Yelverton, 196 N.C. 64, 144. S.E. 534. It is so ordered.\nNew-trial.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Stacy, O. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Aitorneys-General Bruton Rhodes, and Moody for the State.",
      "William Reid Dalton and John R. Hughes for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HAROLD JACK GILBERT.\n(Filed 2 March, 1949.)\nHusband and Wife \u00a7 23\u2014\nIn a prosecution of defendant for willful abandonment and nonsupport of his wife, an instruction which omits the element of willful abandonment as a necessary predicate for a verdict of guilty must be held for reversible error. G.S. 14-322.\nAppeal by defendant from Phillips, J., December Term, 1948, of ROCKINGHAM.\nCriminal prosecution on warrant charging the defendant with willful abandonment and nonsupport of his wife.\nThe defendant was married in 1943. He first took his wife to the home of his stepfather in Greensboro. In July, 1948, they were given notice to vacate their room. The defendant then took his wife to Eeidsville to live in her father\u2019s house. He promised to provide for her support and to return weekly to see her. Neither of which he did.\nVerdict: Guilty as charged.\nJudgment: Twelve months on the roads.\nThe defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Aitorneys-General Bruton Rhodes, and Moody for the State.\nWilliam Reid Dalton and John R. Hughes for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0064-01",
  "first_page_order": 120,
  "last_page_order": 121
}
