{
  "id": 8632457,
  "name": "NATIONAL STORE FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. T. FLOYD WHALEY and THOMAS WHALEY, T/a THE WHALEY FURNITURE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "National Store Fixture Co. v. Whaley",
  "decision_date": "1949-09-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "755",
  "last_page": "755",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "230 N.C. 755"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 975,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.466,
    "sha256": "95d11bc440b6b32c8b286a891683aa695559764fc59c62ff440d6ffec15dbfff",
    "simhash": "1:cfa2de18d2600dba",
    "word_count": 162
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:13.210119+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NATIONAL STORE FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. T. FLOYD WHALEY and THOMAS WHALEY, T/a THE WHALEY FURNITURE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per OuriaM.\nThe case on appeal discloses that the ease was tried in Superior Court, in the main, as one of fact for the jury. The evidence shown in the record is sufficient to support the verdict. And appellants fail to show cause for a new trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per OuriaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wayland P. Britton and John H. Hall for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "J. Henry LeRoy for defendants, appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NATIONAL STORE FIXTURE COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. T. FLOYD WHALEY and THOMAS WHALEY, T/a THE WHALEY FURNITURE COMPANY.\n(Filed 21 September, 1949.)\nAppeal by defendants from Morris, J., at May Term, 1949, of Pas-quotaNK.\nCivil action to recover on contract for various articles of merchandise.\nThe case was submitted to the jury, in the trial court, without objection, upon the single issue, to wit: \u201cAre the defendants indebted to plaintiff, and, if so, in what amount?\u201d, to which the jury answered \u201cYes, $829.71.\u201d From judgment thereon in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal to Supreme Court, and assign error.\nWayland P. Britton and John H. Hall for plaintiff, appellee.\nJ. Henry LeRoy for defendants, appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0755-01",
  "first_page_order": 811,
  "last_page_order": 811
}
