{
  "id": 8630796,
  "name": "LESS MARTIN, Administrator of DAVID MARTIN, JR., Deceased, v. H. R. CURRIE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Martin v. Currie",
  "decision_date": "1949-05-25",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "511",
  "last_page": "513",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "230 N.C. 511"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "111 S.E. 872",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "183 N.C. 830",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8659432
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0830-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "117 S.E. 705",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "185 N.C. 612",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8657203
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/185/0612-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "120 S.E. 342",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "186 N.C. 746",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8654556
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/186/0746-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "128 S.E. 329",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "189 N.C. 840",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8655570,
        8655551
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/189/0840-02",
        "/nc/189/0840-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "129 S.E. 595",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "190 N.C. 256",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8600296
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/190/0256-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "130 S.E. 713",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "190 N.C. 844",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8616209
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/190/0844-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "136 S.E. 117",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "192 N.C. 790",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626967
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/192/0790-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "145 S.E. 570",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "196 N.C. 330",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626607
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/196/0330-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "11 S.E. 2d 326",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "218 N.C. 392",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8620230
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/218/0392-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "37 S.E. 270",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "127 N.C. 304",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8660545
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/127/0304-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "61 N.C. 356",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        2090039
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/61/0356-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "64 S.E. 428",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "150 N.C. 493",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        11271727
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/150/0493-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "70 S.E. 912",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "154 N.C. 474",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8652749,
        8652727
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/154/0474-02",
        "/nc/154/0474-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "124 S.E. 325",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "188 N.C. 222",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8653571
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/188/0222-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "3 S.E. 2d 437",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "215 N.C. 657",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631272
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/215/0657-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "5 S.E. 2d 544",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "216 N.C. 497",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8606420
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/216/0497-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "9 S.E. 2d 15",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "217 N.C. 564",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8613206
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/217/0564-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "26 S.E. 2d 907",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "223 N.C. 401",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8609715
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/223/0401-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 364,
    "char_count": 5060,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.499,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3669611626005995
    },
    "sha256": "84baa9970c4f2975474d12b0cf202d8f8f77de39edf3fd96b8f12bd9e402b051",
    "simhash": "1:d361ae6f641e8398",
    "word_count": 860
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:13.210119+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LESS MARTIN, Administrator of DAVID MARTIN, JR., Deceased, v. H. R. CURRIE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "EbviN, J.\nThe plaintiff\u2019s first exception is addressed to the ruling of the court sustaining an objection of the defendant to a question propounded to the plaintiff\u2019s witness, Elcoe Covington, by plaintiff\u2019s counsel calling for a description of the condition of the tractor in controversy \u201cabout a month after the accident.\u201d This exception cannot be considered on this appeal for the record does not show what evidence this witness would have given if he had been permitted to answer the question. Francis v. Francis, 223 N.C. 401, 26 S.E. 2d 907; Gibson v. Insurance Society, 217 N.C. 564, 9 S.E. 2d 15; In re Will of Redding, 216 N.C. 497, 5 S.E. 2d 544; Hammond v. Williams, 215 N.C. 657, 3 S.E. 2d 437.\nThe defendant reached the scene of the fatal accident immediately after the tractor overturned, and was permitted to testify as to marks then appearing on the ground at that place. Since the record warrants an inference that these marks existed at the time of the accident, this evidence was properly received. Shaw v. Handle Co., 188 N.C. 222, 124 S.E. 325; Norris v. Mills, 154 N.C. 474, 70 S.E. 912; Blevins v. Cotton Mills, 150 N.C. 493, 64 S.E. 428.\nThe court rightly sustained the defendant\u2019s objection to the following question put to defendant on cross-examination by plaintiff\u2019s counsel: \u201cHow much farm land do you have ?\u201d Evidence of the pecuniary state \u25a0of the defendant is irrelevant and inadmissible in an action for damages for death by wrongful act because the controlling statute does not allow recovery of exemplary or punitive damages in such cases. G.S. 28-174; Collier v. Arrington, 61 N.C. 356; Gray v. Little, 127 N.C. 304, 37 S.E. 270.\nThe exception to the charge is untenable. The excerpt assigned as error conforms to the law of master and servant as laid down in repeated decisions of this Court. Murray v. R. R., 218 N.C. 392, 11 S.E. 2d 326; Craver v. Cotton Mills, 196 N.C. 330, 145 S.E. 570; Watson v. Tanning Co., 192 N.C. 790, 136 S.E. 117; Lindsey v. Lumber Co., 190 N.C. 844, 130 S.E. 713; Riggs v. Mfg. Co., 190 N.C. 256, 129 S.E. 595; Cable v. Lumber Co., 189 N.C. 840, 128 S.E. 329; Murphy v. Lumber Co., 186 N.C. 746, 120 S.E. 342; Owen v. Lumber Co., 185 N.C. 612, 117 S.E. 705; Tritt v. Lumber Co., 183 N.C. 830, 111 S.E. 872.\nWhen all is said, the trial in the court below resolved itself into a legal battle over sharply contested issues of fact. The jury answered the issue relating to the actionable negligence of the defendant adverse to plaintiff under a charge free from error. Hence, the trial and judgment must be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "EbviN, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "H. F. Seawell, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Jones & Jones for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LESS MARTIN, Administrator of DAVID MARTIN, JR., Deceased, v. H. R. CURRIE.\n(Filed 25 May, 1949.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 89e\u2014\nThe exclusi\u00f3n of testimony cannot be held prejudicial when it does not appear what the witness would have testified if permitted to do so.\n2. Negligence \u00a7 18\u2014\nWhere there is evidence warranting the inference that marks on the ground at the scene where defendant\u2019s tractor overturned, causing the death of the driver, plaintiff\u2019s intestate, existed at the time of the accident, testimony as to such marks is competent.\n3. Death \u00a7 8\u2014\nSince exemplary or punitive damages are not recoverable in an action for wrongful death, evidence of the pecuniary,state of defendant is irrelevant, and objection is properly sustained to a question asked defendant as to the amount of land he owned. G.S. 28-174.\n4. Master and Servant \u00a7 14a\u2014\nThe charge of the court as to the duties of an employer to his employee and the liability of the employer for negligent injury to the employee, held without error.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Armstrong, J., and a jury, at November Term, 1948, of RichmoND.\nThe plaintiff\u2019s intestate, David Martin, Jr., suffered death from the overturning of a tractor which he was using in rendering agricultural services for his employer, H. R. Currie, the defendant. The plaintiff thereupon sued the defendant for damages under G.S. 28-173 upon a complaint alleging that the death proximately resulted from the negligence of the defendant in furnishing the intestate a defective tractor. The defendant answered, denying negligence on his part and pleading assumption of risk and contributory negligence on the part of the intestate.\nThe evidence at the trial was conflicting, and the court submitted these four issues to the jury: (1) Was the death of plaintiff\u2019s intestate, David Martin, Jr., caused by the negligence of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? (2) If so, did the plaintiff\u2019s intestate, David Martin, Jr., assume the risk incident to his employment? (3) Did plaintiff\u2019s intestate, David Martin, Jr., by his own negligence, contribute to his injury and death? (4) What amount, if any, is plaintiff entitled to receive of the defendant?\nThe jury answered the first issue \u201cNo,\u201d and the court rendered judgment on this verdict exonerating the defendant from liability to the plaintiff. The plaintiff thereupon appealed, assigning, errors.\nH. F. Seawell, Jr., for plaintiff, appellant.\nJones & Jones for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0511-01",
  "first_page_order": 567,
  "last_page_order": 569
}