{
  "id": 8631682,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CLAUDE McCONNELL and SURETY TAR HEEL BOND COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. McConnell",
  "decision_date": "1949-09-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "650",
  "last_page": "650",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "230 N.C. 650"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 82,
    "char_count": 789,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.482,
    "sha256": "fc44fbd788a4b857e9f445db6233d5c8a5bfb13e12c7e4ce93ff8bd6a8701451",
    "simhash": "1:34df7edd325a3fce",
    "word_count": 127
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:13.210119+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CLAUDE McCONNELL and SURETY TAR HEEL BOND COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is a companion case to S. v. Moore, ante, p. 648. In all material essentials the facts are the same. The judgment is affirmed on authority of the opinion in that case.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ramsey \u25a0& Hill for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Charles O. P. Trexler for defendant Tar Heel Bond Co. and C. P. Barringer for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CLAUDE McCONNELL and SURETY TAR HEEL BOND COMPANY.\n(Filed 28 September, 1949.)\nAppeal by defendant bonding company from Nettles, J., April Term, 1949, TbaNsylvaNia.\nAffirmed.\nCriminal prosecution heard on motion of defendant bonding company to vacate judgment absolute on defendant\u2019s appearance bond for want of service of sci. fa.\nThe motion to vacate and set aside judgment absolute was overruled and defendant bonding company appealed.\nRamsey \u25a0& Hill for plaintiff appellee.\nCharles O. P. Trexler for defendant Tar Heel Bond Co. and C. P. Barringer for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0650-01",
  "first_page_order": 706,
  "last_page_order": 706
}