{
  "id": 8632442,
  "name": "STATE v. TOM SUDDRETH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Suddreth",
  "decision_date": "1949-10-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "754",
  "last_page": "755",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "230 N.C. 754"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "52 S.E. 2d 924",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "27 S.E. 2d 443",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "223 N.C. 859",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8619851,
        8619918
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/223/0859-01",
        "/nc/223/0859-02"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "166 S.E. 292",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "203 N.C. 316",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8609830
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/203/0316-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "8 S.E. 2d 927",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "217 N.C. 622",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8614408
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/217/0622-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "40 S.E. 2d 412",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "227 N.C. 71",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8621269
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/227/0071-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1650,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.48,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.594203391136844e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4896013242470893
    },
    "sha256": "00eb3c6a76101a1e242a734b67b027648a3f72b8976bbeb057ed1826d71b7b7b",
    "simhash": "1:9623577d52f75c1f",
    "word_count": 277
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:13.210119+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. TOM SUDDRETH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per CuriaM.\nAppeal to this Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on tbe ground of newly discovered evidence. See S. v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412; S. v. Rodgers, 217 N.C. 622, 8 S.E. 2d 927; S. v. Lea, 203 N.C. 316, 166 S.E. 292, and cases cited therein. See also S. v. Grass, 223 N.C. 859, 27 S.E. 2d 443.\nHence under the authority of decisions in these cases the appeal in the present case is\nDismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per CuriaM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.",
      "W. U. Strickland and Max C. Wilson for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. TOM SUDDRETH.\n(Filed 19 October, 1949.)\nCriminal Xiaw \u00a7 57b\u2014\nNo appeal lies from tlie discretionary refusal of the Superior Court of a motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence.\nAppeal by defendant from Shuford, Special Judge, at Special May Term, 1949, of Caldwell.\nCriminal prosecution upon a bill of indictment charging defendant with tbe murder of one Harry Crisp, Jr.\nVerdict: Guilty of manslaughter.\nJudgment pronounced at November Term, 1948, of Superior Court of Caldwell County.\nOn appeal to Supreme Court at Spring Term, 1949, no error was found, \u2014 see ante, 239, 52 S.E. 2d 924. Thereafter at Special May Term, 1949, of Superior Court of said county, defendant filed motion for a new trial on account of newly discovered evidence,- \u2014 supporting same by certain affidavits. Tbe judge presiding, after bearing tbe affidavits offered by defendant and tbe argument of bis counsel, denied tbe motion in bis discretion.\nFrom order in accordance therewith defendant appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.\nW. U. Strickland and Max C. Wilson for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0754-01",
  "first_page_order": 810,
  "last_page_order": 811
}