{
  "id": 8628833,
  "name": "F. B. CARPENTER and Wife, MARY CARPENTER, and R. L. CARPENTER v. HORACE YANCEY and DAISY YANCEY and H. S. JOYNER",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carpenter v. Yancey",
  "decision_date": "1949-11-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "160",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "231 N.C. 160"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 974,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.427,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5230949758074699
    },
    "sha256": "e307507b3626a5538f33e6837ec6a19967f1713072d71319ffd0236b4044f113",
    "simhash": "1:dbd3b52a2f0e138d",
    "word_count": 165
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:15.383158+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. B. CARPENTER and Wife, MARY CARPENTER, and R. L. CARPENTER v. HORACE YANCEY and DAISY YANCEY and H. S. JOYNER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was an action to recover of the defendants damages for breach of contract relative to the purchase of a house and lot in Gastonia. The case on appeal recites \u201cwritings purporting to set forth the terms of the contract were signed and exchanged.\u201d On the trial the plaintiffs offered the oral testimony of one of the plaintiffs but declined to offer the written contract. The court held plaintiff had failed to make out a case, and entered judgment of nonsuit. We affirm.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. L. Hamme for appellants.",
      "Ernest R. Warren for defendants, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. B. CARPENTER and Wife, MARY CARPENTER, and R. L. CARPENTER v. HORACE YANCEY and DAISY YANCEY and H. S. JOYNER.\n(Filed 23 November, 1949.)\nFrancis, Statute of, \u00a7 15\u2014\nNonsuit is properly entered in an action on a contract relating to the sale of realty when plaintiff introduces only oral evidence of the alleged written agreement.\nAppeal by plaintiffs from Bolhitt, J., September Term, 1949, of GastoN.\nAffirmed.\nJ. L. Hamme for appellants.\nErnest R. Warren for defendants, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0160-01",
  "first_page_order": 210,
  "last_page_order": 210
}