{
  "id": 8629733,
  "name": "MONTISE CLODFELTER v. THE NORTH CAROLINA GAS CORP.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clodfelter v. North Carolina Gas Corp.",
  "decision_date": "1949-12-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "343",
  "last_page": "344",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "231 N.C. 343"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "55 S.E. 2d 189",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "230 N. C., 656",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631758
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/230/0656-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1382,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.509,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20732231879155888
    },
    "sha256": "688841bd42c4c746c65ee60eeb1aa237ff4b736b90d987c583319617aea3919b",
    "simhash": "1:ca265e8e948607ab",
    "word_count": 227
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:15.383158+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MONTISE CLODFELTER v. THE NORTH CAROLINA GAS CORP."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nApparently, both appellants are relying on the same assignment of error as only one appears on the record. It points out no particular ruling to which the parties object. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. We find none. Terry v. Ice & Coal Co., ante, 103; Parker v. Duke University, 230 N. C., 656, 55 S.E. 2d 189.\nThe judgment will be affirmed on both appeals.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. F. Spruill for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Don A. Walser for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MONTISE CLODFELTER v. THE NORTH CAROLINA GAS CORP.\n(Filed 14 December, 1949.)\nAppeals by plaintiff and defendant from Phillips, J., September Term, 1949, of DavidsoN.\nCivil action to recover damages for an alleged negligent injury resulting from the explosion of low quality of gas and defective equipment installed by tbe defendant in the kitchen stove of the \u201cNew Hotel Lexington,\u201d Lexington, N. C.\nIn apt time, the defendant moved (1) to strike certain portions of the complaint as being \u201cirrelevant, redundant and unnecessarily repetitious,\u201d and (2) to make the complaint more definite and certain.\nBoth motions were allowed in part and denied in part, from which rulings the plaintiff and defendant each in apt time, \u201cobjected and excepted to the rulings adverse to their respective contentions, all set forth in said judgment,\u201d and each gave notice of appeal.\nJ. F. Spruill for plaintiff, appellant.\nDon A. Walser for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0343-02",
  "first_page_order": 393,
  "last_page_order": 394
}