{
  "id": 8631985,
  "name": "STATE v. HAL WAY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Way",
  "decision_date": "1950-04-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "716",
  "last_page": "716",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "231 N.C. 716"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "49 S.E. 2d 458",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "229 N.C. 251",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        12165471
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/229/0251-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1061,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.508,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20735436699205242
    },
    "sha256": "2bbfdcef6440e4e45623c1917e84e4b70ed11d8d3b316295a356a7ff402f6995",
    "simhash": "1:51ec162e232e54c9",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:15.383158+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. HAL WAY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:.\nDefendant\u2019s only assignments of error relate to the action of the trial court in overruling his objection to certain questions propounded to defendant on cross-examination, but from inspection of the record the impropriety of the questions does not appear, nor do we perceive harm resulting therefrom to defendant\u2019s cause. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no exception to the judge\u2019s charge to the jury. S. v. Sullivan, 229 N.C. 251 (258), 49 S.E. 2d 458.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Bruton, and Walter F. Brinkley, Member of Staff, for the Slate, appellee.",
      "Sam W. Miller fox defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. HAL WAY.\n(Filed 12 April, 1950.)\nAppeal by defendant from Armstrong, J., December Term, 1949, of RaNdolph. No error.\nThe defendant was indicted for assault with deadly weapon with intent to kill, inflicting serious injury not resulting in death. Gr.S. 14-32. The jury returned verdict of guilty of assault with deadly weapon, and from judgment imposed defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Bruton, and Walter F. Brinkley, Member of Staff, for the Slate, appellee.\nSam W. Miller fox defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0716-01",
  "first_page_order": 766,
  "last_page_order": 766
}