{
  "id": 8632102,
  "name": "CLARA C. STALLINGS v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stallings v. Occidental Life Insurance",
  "decision_date": "1950-04-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "732",
  "last_page": "733",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "231 N.C. 732"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "53 S.E. 2d 90",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "230 N.C. 304",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629690
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/230/0304-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 S.E. 2d 292",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "229 N.C. 529",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        12166769
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/229/0529-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 970,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.526,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.12982294956584e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3236628853651313
    },
    "sha256": "871e9b0356efaedf0aab80e2e1a0aecf3f49f537c7c6a597d379c12a93785933",
    "simhash": "1:03117cfea2568c4b",
    "word_count": 161
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:15.383158+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CLARA C. STALLINGS v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case was here at Fall Term, 1948, (229 N.C. 529, 50 S.E. 2d 292), and again at Spring Term, 1949, (230 N.C. 304, 53 S.E. 2d 90). It was held on both former appeals that the conflicting \u2022evidence presented a case for the jury on the determinative issue whether the policy was delivered absolutely or for the purpose of inspection only. This question was submitted to the jury on substantially the same evi-\u2022denee as that heretofore offered, in a charge free from prejudicial error, .and answered in favor of the plaintiff.\nWe see no compelling reason to disturb the result.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. C. Bulluck for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "Smith, Leach & Anderson for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CLARA C. STALLINGS v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.\n(Filed 19 April, 1950.)\nAppeal by defendant from Hatch, Special Judge, November Term, 1949, of EkaNkliN. No error.\nSuit on a life insurance policy. Erom judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appealed.\nE. C. Bulluck for plaintiff, appellee.\nSmith, Leach & Anderson for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0732-01",
  "first_page_order": 782,
  "last_page_order": 783
}