{
  "id": 8632182,
  "name": "STATE v. ANALPHUS LEE TILLEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Tilley",
  "decision_date": "1950-04-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "734",
  "last_page": "735",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "231 N.C. 734"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "49 S.E. 2d 650",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "229 N.C. 340",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        12165913
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/229/0340-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "44 S.E. 2d 201",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "227 N.C. 677",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8627318
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/227/0677-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1141,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20735745597523253
    },
    "sha256": "68f77488676d773fb77f8a7a0fde947f4b506ac492ae9cd16e4098aa6759c434",
    "simhash": "1:da616cf9babc48e2",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:15.383158+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. ANALPHUS LEE TILLEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe testimony of the prosecution was sufficient to \u2019take the cas\u00e9 to the jury and to support a verdict for the State. S. v. Gibbs, 227 N.C. 677, 44 S.E. 2d 201. Consequently the court rightly refused to dismiss the action upon a compulsory nonsuit under G.S. 15-173. When it is read as a whole, the charge is free from legal error. Wyatt v. Coach Co., 229 N.C. 340, 49 S.E. 2d 650.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Rhodes for the State, appellee.",
      "W. Brantley Womble for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. ANALPHUS LEE TILLEY.\n(Filed 19 April, 1950.)\nAppeal by defendant from Frizzelle, J., and a jury, at October Term, 1949, of Wake.\nThe defendant was charged with aiding and abetting one Allen Dickens in the commission of a misdemeanor, to wit, the unlawful operation of a motor vehicle upon a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The jury found the defendant guilty as charged, and the court imposed judgment on the verdict. The defendant appealed, assigning the refusal to dismiss the action. upon a. compulsory nonsuit and certain excerpts from the charge as error.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Rhodes for the State, appellee.\nW. Brantley Womble for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0734-02",
  "first_page_order": 784,
  "last_page_order": 785
}