{
  "id": 8632282,
  "name": "MARGARET M. ELEDGE, Administratrix of JOHN ELEDGE, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (Original Party Defendant), and M. B. HAYNES and COAL OPERATORS CASUALTY COMPANY (Additional Parties Defendant)",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eledge v. Carolina Power & Light Co.",
  "decision_date": "1950-02-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "737",
  "last_page": "737",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "231 N.C. 737"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "230 N.C. 584",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631212
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/230/0584-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1285,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.498,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.621887471290392e-08,
      "percentile": 0.29016324889983935
    },
    "sha256": "fe03bd5934a212518fc69251a908ffafea5fd4d393d847d2ac445656ee587110",
    "simhash": "1:8a8593163aa2c94e",
    "word_count": 201
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:15.383158+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MARGARET M. ELEDGE, Administratrix of JOHN ELEDGE, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (Original Party Defendant), and M. B. HAYNES and COAL OPERATORS CASUALTY COMPANY (Additional Parties Defendant)."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Winborne and Ervin, JJ.,\nconsidering the petition to rehear.\nCareful consideration of the petition leads us to the conclusion that it should be denied. Observations in the opinion must be read in the light of the matters appearing in the present record. The decision is not to be construed to lay down any general rule invalidating contracts for indemnity against consequences of future acts of negligence.\nPetition denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Winborne and Ervin, JJ.,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R. F. Phillips, Robinson & Morgan, and A. Y. Arledge for petitioner."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MARGARET M. ELEDGE, Administratrix of JOHN ELEDGE, v. CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (Original Party Defendant), and M. B. HAYNES and COAL OPERATORS CASUALTY COMPANY (Additional Parties Defendant).\n(Filed 2 February, 1950.)\nMaster and Servant \u00a7 41\u2014\nTbe decision that a third person tort-feasor is not entitled to set up the indemnity contract of the employer as a cross-action against the employer and its insurance carrier in an action by the personal representative of the deceased employee, does not rule that contracts of indemnity against liability for negligence are invalid.\nPetition by defendant, Carolina Power & Light Company, to rehear this case, reported in 230 N.C. 584. The Justices to whom the petition was referred filed the following memorandum in passing upon the petition:\nR. F. Phillips, Robinson & Morgan, and A. Y. Arledge for petitioner."
  },
  "file_name": "0737-01",
  "first_page_order": 787,
  "last_page_order": 787
}