{
  "id": 8600809,
  "name": "MAGGIE RICHARDSON v. ZELLA WELCH and WINIFRED A. FISHEL, Guardian for ZELLA C. WELCH",
  "name_abbreviation": "Richardson v. Welch",
  "decision_date": "1950-06-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "331",
  "last_page": "332",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "232 N.C. 331"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1430,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.489,
    "sha256": "1584f339f5d71313cda11c6ef464f0880458e699b32548e43039819ea2b1fb29",
    "simhash": "1:79cb7e46ad4e1049",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:42:59.145817+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MAGGIE RICHARDSON v. ZELLA WELCH and WINIFRED A. FISHEL, Guardian for ZELLA C. WELCH."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAllegations against one who is not a party to an action, and which have no bearing, on the plaintiff\u2019s right to obtain the relief sought, do not constitute proper pleadings and should, on motion, be stricken therefrom.\nThe motion to strike, interposed below, should have been granted. The ruling of the court below is\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Geo. W. Braddy for plaintiff.",
      "Elledge & Bro.iuder for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MAGGIE RICHARDSON v. ZELLA WELCH and WINIFRED A. FISHEL, Guardian for ZELLA C. WELCH.\n(Filed 9 June, 1950.)\nPleadings \u00a7 31\u2014\nAllegations against one who is not a party to an action, and which have no bearing on the plaintiff\u2019s right to obtain the relief sought, do not constitute proper pleadings and should, on motion, be stricken therefrom.\nAppeal by defendant, Winifred A. Eisbel, Guardian for Zella C. Welch, from Crisp, Special Judge, at February Term, 1950, of Foksyth.\nCivil action instituted to recover for services rendered to Zella Welch. Thereafter Zella Welch was adjudged incompetent and Winifred A. Fishel was duly appointed as her Guardian, and made a party defendant.\nAn amended complaint was filed and tbe plaintiff alleges that compen.sation was denied tbe plaintiff by reason of tbe improper influence and \u2022conduct of tbe brother of Zella Welch, who is not a party to tbe action.\nTbe defendant moved to strike these allegations, tbe motion was denied, .and tbe defendant Guardian appealed, assigning error.\nGeo. W. Braddy for plaintiff.\nElledge & Bro.iuder for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0331-01",
  "first_page_order": 379,
  "last_page_order": 380
}