{
  "id": 8614380,
  "name": "STATE v. BILLIE MAPLES",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Maples",
  "decision_date": "1950-11-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "732",
  "last_page": "733",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "232 N.C. 732"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "25 S.E. 2d 445",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "223 N.C. 110",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8600035
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/223/0110-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 S.E. 2d 193",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "case_ids": [
        2073474
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/sc/212/0449-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "226 N.C. 478",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8621419
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/226/0478-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "34 S.E. 2d 143",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "225 N.C. 213",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8603852
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/225/0213-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "22 S.E. 2d 241",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "222 N.C. 137",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629015
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/222/0137-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1695,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.491,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3567269752020292
    },
    "sha256": "318d7b775e20019571845d6fe4a6cfee4e29759b8eb5a11872f43090a2588899",
    "simhash": "1:8e346285358fcf56",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:42:59.145817+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "JOHNSON, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. BILLIE MAPLES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee OuRiAM.\nTbe judgment of tbe court below dismissing defendant\u2019s \u25a0purported appeal from tbe county court must be affirmed on authority of S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241; S. v. Miller, 225 N.C. 213, 34 S.E. 2d 143; and S. v. Farrar, 226 N.C. 478, 38 S.E. 2d 193. Since tbe court below bad no jurisdiction to bear tbe appeal, we have none. Shepard v. Leonard, 223 N.C. 110, 25 S.E. 2d 445. Therefore, we have mo authority, on this appeal, to entertain defendant\u2019s motion in arrest of judgment.\nAppeal dismissed.\nJOHNSON, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee OuRiAM."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Moody, and Walter F. Brinkley, Member of Staff, for the State.",
      "Seawell & Seawell for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. BILLIE MAPLES.\n(Filed 29 November, 1950.)\n1. Criminal Law \u00a7 63\u2014\nNo appeal lies from an order that a suspended judgment be executed upon findings that defendant had violated one of the conditions of suspension.\n2. Criminal Law \u00a7 67a\u2014\nWhere the Superior Court has no jurisdiction of an attempted appeal from the Recorder\u2019s Court, the Supreme Court can acquire no jurisdiction by further appeal.\nJoi-msoN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this ease.\nAppeal by defendant from Phillips, J., May Term, 1950, of Moore.\nAppeal dismissed.\nDefendant was convicted in the Recorder\u2019s Court of Moore County for a violation of the Motor Yehicle Law. The judgment pronounced was suspended on specified conditions. Thereafter the judgment was invoked for breach of one of the conditions imposed. Defendant appealed \u25a0to tbe Superior Court. Tbe court below dismissed tbe appeal for want \u2022of jurisdiction and defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Moody, and Walter F. Brinkley, Member of Staff, for the State.\nSeawell & Seawell for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0732-01",
  "first_page_order": 780,
  "last_page_order": 781
}