{
  "id": 8623259,
  "name": "PERCY E. WILLIAMS v. FLOYD RAINES and Wife, THELMA NOE RAINES",
  "name_abbreviation": "Williams v. Raines",
  "decision_date": "1951-11-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "452",
  "last_page": "453",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "234 N.C. 452"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1478,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.502,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5231071386787415
    },
    "sha256": "1c20272ac149866960dc0c38bdb75fb9bcae42f640bd761cf6ed189857e0a4a7",
    "simhash": "1:5c3bb2feeb02bd7d",
    "word_count": 252
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:34:56.500685+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "PERCY E. WILLIAMS v. FLOYD RAINES and Wife, THELMA NOE RAINES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAll of plaintiff\u2019s assignments of error, save one, are bottomed on exceptions to the charge of the court on the first issue. As the verdict on that issue was in favor of plaintiff, any error in the charge of the court in respect thereto is harmless and affords no cause for a new trial.\nThe lone exception to the charge on the second issue is directed to the statement of a contention. It does not appear that this exception was entered in apt time. In any event, we are unable to perceive that plaintiff was prejudiced thereby.\nTbe jury, in a trial free from error on the second issue, has resolved the question of contributory negligence against the plaintiff. He must abide the result.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J ones, Reed & Griffin fox plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Whitaker <& Jeffress for defendants, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "PERCY E. WILLIAMS v. FLOYD RAINES and Wife, THELMA NOE RAINES.\n(Filed 7 November, 1951.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 39b\u2014\nAssignments of error relating to an issue answered in appellant\u2019s favor can afford no ground for new trial.\n2. Appeal and Error \u00a7 6c (6) \u2014\nException to misstatement of a contention must be entered in apt time.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Morris, J., May Term, 1951, LeNOir.\nAction for damages arising out of a collision of two automobiles at a street intersection. '\nIssues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury. The jury answered each of the first two issues \u201cyes.\u201d From judgment on the verdict plaintiff appealed.\nJ ones, Reed & Griffin fox plaintiff, appellant.\nWhitaker <& Jeffress for defendants, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0452-01",
  "first_page_order": 498,
  "last_page_order": 499
}