{
  "id": 8624676,
  "name": "STATE v. NATALLIE DOBBS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dobbs",
  "decision_date": "1951-11-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "560",
  "last_page": "560",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "234 N.C. 560"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "156 S.E. 126",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "199 N.C. 788",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8615941
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/199/0788-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "174 S.E. 447",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "206 N.C. 598",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631947
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/206/0598-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "29 S.E. 2d 698",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "224 N.C. 234",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8598952
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/224/0234-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1052,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.492,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.5152311044134586e-07,
      "percentile": 0.668283942422898
    },
    "sha256": "d200264f39293ba1ca656b5e8e4ea076a4bfc120a7ba43b165120a1836fbbe06",
    "simhash": "1:ca80525cc444931e",
    "word_count": 176
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:34:56.500685+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. NATALLIE DOBBS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nWhile the assignments of error appear to be without merit, they are not properly before us for consideration.\nThe record filed in this Court is fatally defective for the reason that no warrant or bill of indictment appears therein.\nThe appeal is dismissed on authority of S. v. Dry, 224 N.C. 234, 29 S.E. 2d 698; S. v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598, 174 S.E. 447; Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Moody, and Robert B. Broughton, Member of Staff, for the State.",
      "Frank P. Cooke for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. NATALLIE DOBBS.\n(Filed 28 November, 1951.)\nCriminal Daw \u00a7 77a\u2014\nWhere the record contains no warrant or indictment the appeal will be dismissed for want of essential parts of the record.\nAppeal by defendant from Sink, J., June Term, 1951, of GastoN.\nThe defendant was tried in Superior Court and found guilty of having in her possession three pints of nontax-paid liquor.\nFrom the judgment entered on the verdict, the defendant appeals, and assigns error.\nAttorney-General McMullan, Assistant Attorney-General Moody, and Robert B. Broughton, Member of Staff, for the State.\nFrank P. Cooke for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0560-01",
  "first_page_order": 606,
  "last_page_order": 606
}