{
  "id": 8625862,
  "name": "STATE v. RANSOM MURPHY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Murphy",
  "decision_date": "1952-10-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "380",
  "last_page": "380",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "236 N.C. 380"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "70 S.E. 2d 498",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "235 N.C. 503",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8625680
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/235/0503-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1632,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.484,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.36519233360709447
    },
    "sha256": "d774be010f468e623f56408d093c2cf8d59ed4d851877f21a2b9f3e2cd29d3ab",
    "simhash": "1:9ca0656c6234168b",
    "word_count": 260
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:03:47.341722+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. RANSOM MURPHY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nAppeal to the Supreme Court does not lie from a discretionary determination of an application for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Hence, under authority of case of S. v. Bryant, ante, 379, opinion this day handed down, the appeal in the present case is\nDismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.",
      "David J. Turlington, Jr., for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. RANSOM MURPHY.\n(Filed 29 October, 1952.)\nAppeal by defendant from Burney, J., at August Term, 1952, of SAMPSON.\nCriminal prosecution upon warrant issued out of County Eecorder\u2019s Court, tried in Superior Court of Sampson County, on appeal thereto from judgment of the Eeeorder\u2019s Court charging, as limited by the trial judge, that defendant violated prohibition laws in manner therein stated.\nYerdict: \u201cGuilty of possession for the purpose of sale and of operating a public nuisance.\u201d\nJudgment: Confinement in the common jail, etc.\nOn appeal therefrom to the Supreme Court at Spring Term, 1952, no error was found. See 235 N.C. 503, 70 S.E. 2d 498.\nThereafter at the next succeeding term, August Term, 1952, of Superior Court of Sampson County, N. C., defendant filed in writing a motion for new trial on account of newly discovered evidence, \u2014 supporting same by certain affidavits.\nThe presiding judge, after considering said written motion and affidavits filed therewith, and on examination of the record of the case on appeal to the Supreme Court, as aforesaid, denied the motion in his discretion.\nFrom order in accordance therewith defendant appeals to Supreme Court, and assigns error.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.\nDavid J. Turlington, Jr., for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0380-01",
  "first_page_order": 432,
  "last_page_order": 432
}