{
  "id": 8619633,
  "name": "STATE v. CARL L. BOWEN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Bowen",
  "decision_date": "1953-05-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "766",
  "last_page": "766",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "237 N.C. 766"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "74 S.E. 2d 609",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "74 S.E. 2d 209",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "75 S.E. 2d 703",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "73 S.E. 2d 283",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "236 N.C. 454",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626302
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/236/0454-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1555,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.429,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2072003039559449
    },
    "sha256": "cd44ac1afbfc4c38954f424ba0f029b58e9b0bfc54d3bda5c0ba728485f8ef68",
    "simhash": "1:d61bd3f8141f0ec2",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:56:56.799237+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CARL L. BOWEN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Cubiam.\nIn this Court the defendant moves in arrest of judgment. The Attorney-General concedes error in the judgment for the reason set out in S. v. Thomas, 236 N.C. 454, 73 S.E. 2d 283.\nThe motion in arrest of judgment is allowed, and the case remanded to the Superior Court of Durham County for trial upon a bill of indictment or for such other disposition as the law provides. S. v. Williams, ante, 436, 75 S.E. 2d 703; S. v. Bailey, ante, 273, 74 S.E. 2d 209; S. v. Pitt, ante, 274, 74 S.E. 2d 609.\nJudgment arrested.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.",
      "Edwards \u2022& Sanders for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CARL L. BOWEN.\n(Filed 20 May, 1953.)\nConstitutional Jlaw \u00a7 32: Criminal Law \u00a7 56\u2014\nWhere a prosecution for assault and battery with a deadly weapon is transferred to the Superior Court from the Recorder\u2019s Court upon defendant\u2019s demand for a jury trial, initial trial in the Superior Court upon the original warrant is a nullity and the judgment will be arrested on appeal to the Supreme Court.\nAppeal by defendant from McLean, Special Judge, August Term, 1952, of Dubham.\nJudgment arrested.\nTbe defendant was charged in the warrant in the Recorder\u2019s Court of Durham County with the criminal offense of assault and battery with a deadly weapon. Upon request of the defendant for jury trial, the case was transferred to the Superior Court of Durham County.\nIn the Superior Court the defendant was put to trial on the warrant, found guilty by the jury and sentenced by the judge. Defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General McMullan and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.\nEdwards \u2022& Sanders for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0766-01",
  "first_page_order": 810,
  "last_page_order": 810
}