{
  "id": 8613672,
  "name": "CLARK P. CRAUMER v. JONAS GRANNICK",
  "name_abbreviation": "Craumer v. Grannick",
  "decision_date": "1953-11-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "559",
  "last_page": "560",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "238 N.C. 559"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 136,
    "char_count": 1724,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.456,
    "sha256": "696887bd89368edf95f861e14d1d189f3120ab6e081b4f3e49f91dddce3e9319",
    "simhash": "1:ff7a21e66c2eb1a3",
    "word_count": 276
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:58:50.226870+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "\u2019Winbokne, J., dissents."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "CLARK P. CRAUMER v. JONAS GRANNICK."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Ervin, J.\nThe plaintiff\u2019s\u2018appeal challenges the validity of th\u00e9 portion of the order refusing to strike the\u2018third further answer and def\u00e9ns\u00e9 from\u2019 the\u2019 answer:' For' the1 reasons' stated in the Penn Dixie Lines case, this c'ahise' is -remanded to\u2019 the Superior Court of Harnett County with' directions that an order be entered' striking out the third further answer\u2019 and defense.\nError and remanded.\n\u2019Winbokne, J., dissents.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Ervin, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Talmadge L. Narron for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "A. J. Fletcher, F^.T. Dupree?Jr., and G. Earl Weaver for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CLARK P. CRAUMER v. JONAS GRANNICK.\n(Filed 11 November, 1953.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Burgwyn, Special Judge, at March Term, 1953, of HaeNett.\nCivil action to recover damages for actionable negligence heard upon motion to strike allegations from answer.\nThis is a companion case to the action this day decided entitled Penn Dixie lAnes, Inc., v. Jonas Grannick. The plaintiff Clark P. Craumer sued the defendant Jonas Grannick for damages for the injury done his Ford tractor in the collision involved in that action. The complaint and the answer in this suit are couched in practically the same language as the complaint and the answer in the Penn Dixie Lines case. The plaintiff moved to strike from the answer in this suit third and fourth further answers and defenses virtually identical with the third and fourth further answers and defenses pleaded in the Penn Dixie Lines case. The presiding judge entered an order whereby he struck the fourth further answer and defense, and refused to strike the third further answer and defense. Each./pa-riy \u00a1noted .an appeal from .the portion of the order adverse to him. The defendant 'subsequently, abandoned his appeal. . \u25a0.:\nTalmadge L. Narron for plaintiff, appellant.\nA. J. Fletcher, F^.T. Dupree?Jr., and G. Earl Weaver for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0559-01",
  "first_page_order": 609,
  "last_page_order": 610
}