{
  "id": 8626019,
  "name": "MRS. FRANCES PREVATTE v. W. D. PREVATTE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Prevatte v. Prevatte",
  "decision_date": "1953-12-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "120",
  "last_page": "121",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "239 N.C. 120"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "178 S.E. 248",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N.C. 722",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628205
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0722-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "50 S.E. 2d 33",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "229 N.C. 434",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        12166390
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/229/0434-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "238 N.C. 577",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8614240
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/238/0577-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1661,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6033322792178232
    },
    "sha256": "f547490644144f0ac1c94b04a5b9f8df1bb5d45e1c009840498349eb44ab5f4d",
    "simhash": "1:d02b2e3e4bab720f",
    "word_count": 269
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:51:12.847603+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. FRANCES PREVATTE v. W. D. PREVATTE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis was a suit for divorce a mensa. From order denying motion for alimony pendente Ute the plaintiff gave notice of appeal and attempted to appeal in forma pauperis. However, it appears that there was no order allowing appeal in forma, pauperis after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term. GLS. 1-288. True, the judge wrote in the judgment \u201cplaintiff allowed to appeal in forma pau-peris upon compliance with the statute,\u201d but this would not authorize disregard of the provisions of the statute. Anderson v. Worthington, 238 N.C. 577. The requirements of the statute allowing appeals in forma pauperis are mandatory and failure to comply deprives this Court of any appellate jurisdiction. Williams v. Tillman, 229 N.C. 434, 50 S.E. 2d 33; Brown v. Kress & Co., 207 N.C. 722, 178 S.E. 248.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "I. Murchison Biggs for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Robert Weinstein and F. D. Hachett for defendant appellee'."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. FRANCES PREVATTE v. W. D. PREVATTE.\n(Filed 16 December, 1953.)\n1. Appeal and Error \u00a7 12\u2014\nWhere the judge writes on the judgment that plaintiff be allowed to appeal in forma pauperis upon compliance with the statute, but plaintiff obtains no order allowing appeal in forma pauperis after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term, the appeal must be dismissed for failure to comply with the mandatory provision of the statute. G.S. 1-288.\n2. Same\u2014\nThe statutory requirements of appeals in forma pauperis are mandatory, and failure to comply deprives the Supreme Court of any appellate jurisdiction.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Grady, Emergency Judge, August Term, 1953, of RobesoN.\nAppeal dismissed.\nI. Murchison Biggs for plaintiff appellant.\nRobert Weinstein and F. D. Hachett for defendant appellee'."
  },
  "file_name": "0120-01",
  "first_page_order": 164,
  "last_page_order": 165
}