{
  "id": 8684817,
  "name": "CHARLES L. TORRENCE vs JOHN KERNS et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Torrence v. Kerns",
  "decision_date": "1841-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "71",
  "last_page": "71",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Ired. 71"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "24 N.C. 71"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 51,
    "char_count": 406,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "feee0aa39230f50d40970aa1c6ad954d1dea8babf828aadff29da405d4453166",
    "simhash": "1:39ce1cad8123402c",
    "word_count": 71
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:03:08.889044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CHARLES L. TORRENCE vs JOHN KERNS et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis case is governed by that of McNamara v the same defendants. There must therefore be the same judgment in it.\nJudgment accordingly.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Badger for the plaintiff.",
      "Barringer' for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CHARLES L. TORRENCE vs JOHN KERNS et al.\nThis was an appeal from the judgment of Rowan Superior Court, at Fall Term, 1841, and the case is precisely the same as that of McNamara v Kerns above reported.\nBadger for the plaintiff.\nBarringer' for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0071-01",
  "first_page_order": 71,
  "last_page_order": 71
}