{
  "id": 8595217,
  "name": "L. M. MACON v. MISS E. M. MURRAY, SAM MURRAY and JOHN MURRAY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Macon v. Murray",
  "decision_date": "1954-04-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "116",
  "last_page": "116",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "240 N.C. 116"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "73 S.E. 2d 165",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "236 N.C. 484",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626421
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/236/0484-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 S.E. 2d 807",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "231 N.C. 61",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8628174
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/231/0061-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "70 S.E. 2d 505",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "235 N.C. 554",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626001
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/235/0554-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 S.E. 2d 462",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "234 N.C. 451",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8623208
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/234/0451-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "66 S.E. 819",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "234 N.C. 112",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8618836
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/234/0112-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "38 S.E. 2d 517",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "226 N.C. 474",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8621376
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/226/0474-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "24 S.E. 2d 338",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "222 N.C. 637",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8631868
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/222/0637-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "190 S.E. 217",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "211 N.C. 327",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8626694
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/211/0327-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "181 S.E. 328",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "208 N.C. 416",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8608691
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/208/0416-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "178 S.E. 113",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N.C. 652",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8627920
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0652-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "175 S.E. 713",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "207 N.C. 47",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8622362
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/207/0047-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "221 N.C. 544",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 203,
    "char_count": 2014,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.453,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.259244762335987e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4328038043916846
    },
    "sha256": "fd3773800169799eb2d1a06cefc76fb82b01777631393261bedb67a57c856e8f",
    "simhash": "1:628ff6183c2c7957",
    "word_count": 366
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:47:25.593057+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. M. MACON v. MISS E. M. MURRAY, SAM MURRAY and JOHN MURRAY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee. Cueiam.\nAs the pleadings on which the case was tried have been omitted from the record, in violation of the requirements of Rule 19, Section 1 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 553, the appeal must be dismissed in accordance with the uniform practice in such cases. See S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E. 713, and cases cited. See also Ins. Co. v. Bullard, 207 N.C. 652, 178 S.E. 113; Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N.C. 416, 181 S.E. 328; Bank v. McCullers, 211 N.C. 327, 190 S.E. 217; Washington County v. Land Co., 222 N.C. 637, 24 S.E. 2d 338; Ericson v. Ericson, 226 N.C. 474, 38 S.E. 2d 517; S. v. Jenkins, 234 N.C. 112, 66 S.E. 819; Smoak v. Newton, 234 N.C. 451, 67 S.E. 2d 462; Allen v. Allen, 235 N.C. 554, 70 S.E. 2d 505. \u201cWe can judicially know only what properly appears on the record,\u201d Stacy, C. J., in S. v. Lumber Co., supra.\nIn the absence of agreement of parties, it is not now deemed expedient to supply the deficiency by reference to records on former appeals.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee. Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John L. Murray for defendants, appellants.",
      "No counsel contra."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. M. MACON v. MISS E. M. MURRAY, SAM MURRAY and JOHN MURRAY.\n(Filed 7 April, 1954.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 19\u2014\nWhen the pleadings upon which the case was tried are not in the record, the appeal must be dismissed. Rule of Practice in the Supreme Court No. 19.\nAppeal by defendants from Hall, S. J., at October Special Term, 1953, Of RANDOLPH.\nCivil action to recover compensation for wort performed by plaintiff for defendants in cutting timber standing on their land, etc., heard in this Court on former appeals reported in 231 N.C. 61, 55 S.E. 2d 807, and 236 N.C. 484, 73 S.E. 2d 165, and heard, thereafter, in Superior Court, on motion of defendants to re-tax costs therein \u2014 when and where the judge presiding, \u201cbeing of the opinion that no sufficient cause had been shown for granting said motion,\u201d ordered that the motion be disallowed. Defendants excepted thereto and appeal to Supreme Court, and assign error.\nJohn L. Murray for defendants, appellants.\nNo counsel contra."
  },
  "file_name": "0116-01",
  "first_page_order": 160,
  "last_page_order": 160
}