{
  "id": 8599645,
  "name": "CLINTON J. BURROUGHS v. H. D. MORRISON and J. M. McMANUS, Partners, Trading as MOR-MAC MOTOR COURT, and RULANE GAS COMPANY, a Corporation",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burroughs v. Morrison",
  "decision_date": "1954-05-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "337",
  "last_page": "337",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "240 N.C. 337"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 108,
    "char_count": 1060,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.477,
    "sha256": "5b5166ab14c5ce98ef899e11ed9d57db29f0f7c958e0d261f6d06321af6ac8a4",
    "simhash": "1:125f7dbd662cbd48",
    "word_count": 169
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:47:25.593057+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CLINTON J. BURROUGHS v. H. D. MORRISON and J. M. McMANUS, Partners, Trading as MOR-MAC MOTOR COURT, and RULANE GAS COMPANY, a Corporation."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per. Curiam.\nThe ruling of the court below is reversed for the reasons set out in the opinion in Caldwell, Admr., v. Morrison, et al., ante, 324.\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per. Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bell, Horn, Bradley & Gebhardt for plaintiff, appellee.",
      "Covington & Lobdell for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CLINTON J. BURROUGHS v. H. D. MORRISON and J. M. McMANUS, Partners, Trading as MOR-MAC MOTOR COURT, and RULANE GAS COMPANY, a Corporation.\n(Filed 19 May, 1954.)\nAppeal by defendant Rulane Gas Company from Hubbard, Special Judge, November Extra Civil Term, 1953, of MeckxeNburg.\nThis is a civil action instituted by the plaintiff to recover for personal injuries sustained from the inhalation of monoxide poisoning while a guest of the Mor-Mae Motor Court.\nThe allegations against the appellant, with respect to its negligence, are identical with those set out and discussed in the case of Caldwell, Admr., v. Morrison, et al., decided herewith.\nThe appellant demurred''to the complaint on the same grounds set out in the above case. The demurrer was likewise overruled and it appeals, assigning error.\nBell, Horn, Bradley & Gebhardt for plaintiff, appellee.\nCovington & Lobdell for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0337-01",
  "first_page_order": 381,
  "last_page_order": 381
}