{
  "id": 8607212,
  "name": "H. A. COLLINS and Wife, PARALEE COLLINS, and RUTH C. BROOKSHIRE, Petitioners, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission",
  "decision_date": "1954-09-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "627",
  "last_page": "628",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "240 N.C. 627"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1521,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0456132555584416e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5519902897813733
    },
    "sha256": "fec60bfc6f2d912df713ac7715e49096deb8e8242270dcfbe5ec5198f1b786b6",
    "simhash": "1:cb4a8b70507c6860",
    "word_count": 248
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:47:25.593057+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. A. COLLINS and Wife, PARALEE COLLINS, and RUTH C. BROOKSHIRE, Petitioners, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nBespondent\u2019s exceptive assignments of error fail to raise any question of law of sufficient moment to require discussion. Upon the rendition of the verdict the respondent did not request the court to poll the jury. While the amount of the verdict may prompt the surmise that it was a quotient verdict, it alone is insufficient to compel the conclusion, as a matter of law, that it was in fact a quotient verdict.\nAs no prejudicial error is made to appear, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bon 0. 7oung for petitioner appellees.",
      "B. Brookes Peters and McLean, Elmore & Martin for respondent appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. A. COLLINS and Wife, PARALEE COLLINS, and RUTH C. BROOKSHIRE, Petitioners, v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION.\n(Filed 22 September, 1954.)\nTrial \u00a7 39\u2014\nEven though the amount of the verdict may prompt the surmise that it was a quotient verdict, this alone is insufficient to compel the conclusion, as a matter of law, that it was in fact a quotient verdict.\nAppeal by respondent from Pless, J., March Term 1954, BuNcombe. No error.\nSpecial proceeding for the recovery of compensation for the land of petitioners appropriated by respondent for highway purposes.\nIn the proceeding before the clerk, the commissioners assessed the damages, the clerk signed judgment on the report of the commissioners, and respondent appealed.\nIn the court below the jury fixed the damages sustained by petitioners at $1,666.67. From judgment on the verdict respondent appealed.\nBon 0. 7oung for petitioner appellees.\nB. Brookes Peters and McLean, Elmore & Martin for respondent appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0627-01",
  "first_page_order": 671,
  "last_page_order": 672
}