{
  "id": 8607431,
  "name": "CAROLINA DRIVE-UR-SELF, INC., v. JAMES B. MAIDEN, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of ALLIED ROOFING COMPANY",
  "name_abbreviation": "Carolina Drive-Ur-Self, Inc. v. Maiden",
  "decision_date": "1954-09-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "629",
  "last_page": "630",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "240 N.C. 629"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1379,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.483,
    "sha256": "9796bbea24aa5530284d2f98d8d573b1f7cb6b53360627331ee7d0708325b08d",
    "simhash": "1:716ab7ce175d914d",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:47:25.593057+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "CAROLINA DRIVE-UR-SELF, INC., v. JAMES B. MAIDEN, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of ALLIED ROOFING COMPANY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Ctfeiam.\nDue and careful consideration has been given to each assignment of error presented by tbe appellant on this appeal, and we find no error in tbe trial below of sufficient merit to warrant a disturbance of tbe judgment entered in tbe Superior Court. Tbe facts are simple. Tbe applicable rules of law well established. There is no need for further discussion. All the defendant\u2019s assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment below is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Ctfeiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ward \u25a0& Bennett for Plaintiff, Appellee.",
      "S. J. Pegram and William J. Cocke for Defendant, Appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "CAROLINA DRIVE-UR-SELF, INC., v. JAMES B. MAIDEN, Trading and Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of ALLIED ROOFING COMPANY.\n(Filed 22 September, 1954.)\nAppeal, by defendant from Whitmire, Special Judge, July Conflict \u201cA\u201d Term 1954 of BuNcombe.\nCivil action to recover on rental contract of 8$ per mile, plus $25.00 per week and 3% sales tax thereon, on automobiles rented and used by tbe defendant from tbe plaintiff. Tbe General County Court of Buncombe County entered judgment for tbe plaintiff in tbe exact amount prayed for in tbe complaint. Tbe defendant appealed to tbe Superior Court, which court overruled each and every one of tbe defendant\u2019s assignments of error and in all respects affirmed tbe judgment of tbe General County Court.\nTbe defendant appealed to tbe Supreme Court assigning errors.\nWard \u25a0& Bennett for Plaintiff, Appellee.\nS. J. Pegram and William J. Cocke for Defendant, Appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0629-01",
  "first_page_order": 673,
  "last_page_order": 674
}