{
  "id": 8611418,
  "name": "NANNIE T. HARRISON v. ANNIE B. KAPP and THOMAS E. KAPP",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harrison v. Kapp",
  "decision_date": "1955-01-14",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "408",
  "last_page": "409",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "241 N.C. 408"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 192,
    "char_count": 2693,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3393041538946303e-07,
      "percentile": 0.630801448269764
    },
    "sha256": "7188bf741267608bbba15408b9541c2a1f8890fc901aaf05ba8e77b3a7196ab6",
    "simhash": "1:f721fb43d0b46764",
    "word_count": 431
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:40.140494+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NANNIE T. HARRISON v. ANNIE B. KAPP and THOMAS E. KAPP."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe plaintiff\u2019s showing that she entered the intersection first, that she was on the right and the defendants on her left, is sufficient to survive the motion for nonsuit and take the case to the jury. G-.S. 20-155. As is customary in reversing a nonsuit, we refrain from discussing the evidence, except to the extent necessary to show the reason for the conclusion reached.\nBeversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Ingle, Rucker \u25a0& Ingle for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "Deal, Hutchins \u25a0& Minor, Jyy Fred S. Hutchins, for defendants, appel-lees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NANNIE T. HARRISON v. ANNIE B. KAPP and THOMAS E. KAPP.\n(Filed 14 January, 1955.)\nAutomobiles \u00a7\u00a7 8i, 18h (2) \u2014\n\u25a0 This action was instituted to recover damages resulting from a collision at an intersection of streets in a municipality. Plaintiff\u2019s evidence tbat slie entered tbe intersection first and tbat defendants entered tbe intersection from ber left, is sufficient to take tbe case to tbe jury over defendants\u2019 motion to nonsuit. G.S. 20-155.\nAppeal by tbe plaintiff from Fo.untain, Special Judge, 19 July, 1954 Term, Forsyte.\nTbe plaintiff brought this action, alleging she suffered personal injuries and property damage on account of tbe actionable negligence of tbe defendants in a collision between her Ford and the Plymouth driven by tbe defendant Annie B. Kapp. The accident occurred at 11:30 a.m. on a clear day at tbe intersection of First Street and Cloverdale Avenue in tbe City of Winston-Salem.\nTbe defendants denied negligence on tbe part of Annie B. Kapp and set up a counterclaim alleging actionable negligence on tbe part of tbe plaintiff and asked for recovery for personal injury and property damage suffered by the defendants.\nTbe plaintiff\u2019s evidence disclosed tbat West First Street runs near, east and west and tbat Cloverdale Avenue runs near north and south. There was an electrically operated traffic control signal light over the center of the intersection. However, at the time of the accident this light was temporarily out of working order. The plaintiff was going west on First Street, the defendants north on Cloverdale. The defendants, therefore, were to plaintiff\u2019s left, and the plaintiff was on the defendants\u2019 right. Mrs. Motsinger, a plaintiff\u2019s witness, testified she saw the accident; that plaintiff eritered the intersection first, at about 15 miles per hour; that the defendants did not stop as they approached the intersection, but entered at about 20 or 25 miles per hour. The cars came to resfion the northwest corner of the intersection.\nAt the conclusion of the plaintiff\u2019s evidence, motion for judgment of nonsuit was made and sustained, and from the judgment dismissing the action the plaintiff excepted and appealed.\nIngle, Rucker \u25a0& Ingle for plaintiff, appellant.\nDeal, Hutchins \u25a0& Minor, Jyy Fred S. Hutchins, for defendants, appel-lees."
  },
  "file_name": "0408-01",
  "first_page_order": 446,
  "last_page_order": 447
}