{
  "id": 8620103,
  "name": "STATE v. SAMUEL J. BROWN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Brown",
  "decision_date": "1955-09-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "602",
  "last_page": "602",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "242 N.C. 602"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "190 S.E. 735",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "211 N.C. 736",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8629162,
        8629182
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/211/0736-01",
        "/nc/211/0736-02"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 112,
    "char_count": 1104,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3608438240779088e-07,
      "percentile": 0.636282269738506
    },
    "sha256": "838c95c558ab895d4db1ece6b37a96ca023cdc0265f3d5fc83596b86937f429a",
    "simhash": "1:506a37dab67f4e8b",
    "word_count": 175
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:51:17.837681+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. SAMUEL J. BROWN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Curiam.\nIt is the unanimous opinion of this Court that defendant\u2019s motion for nonsuit was properly overruled.\nTwo members of the Court, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., not sitting, but with Devin, Emergency Justice, participating in lieu of Winborne, J., and the six sitting members being equally divided in opinion as to whether prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent. Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.",
      "W. W. Candler and Cecil C. Jackson for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. SAMUEL J. BROWN.\n(Filed 21 September, 1955.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 38\u2014\nWhere the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.\nAppeal by defendant from Nettles, </., February Term, 1955, of BuNcombe.\nUpon indictment and trial by jury, defendant was found guilty of larceny as charged. From judgment pronounced, imposing a prison sentence, defendant appealed.\nAttorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.\nW. W. Candler and Cecil C. Jackson for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0602-01",
  "first_page_order": 644,
  "last_page_order": 644
}