{
  "id": 8620391,
  "name": "H. L. SEARS v. F. WOOD BOYCE t/a HOME BEAUTIFUL",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sears v. Boyce",
  "decision_date": "1955-09-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "606",
  "last_page": "607",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "242 N.C. 606"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 124,
    "char_count": 1207,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "sha256": "eb35ef9ba7ae4af0dafeb5461ae2e3e3824e160e180254025d0d48038465c646",
    "simhash": "1:f52667beda4f55fc",
    "word_count": 200
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:51:17.837681+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "H. L. SEARS v. F. WOOD BOYCE t/a HOME BEAUTIFUL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Cubiam.\nThe defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff's evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A careful examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that it was sufficient to require its submission to the jury. Therefore, the judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.\nWiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. W. Jennette for 'plaintiff, appellee.",
      "LeRoy & Goodwin for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. L. SEARS v. F. WOOD BOYCE t/a HOME BEAUTIFUL.\n(Filed 21 September, 1955.)\nAppeal by defendant from Paul, Special Judge, May Term, 1955, of PASQUOTANK.\nThe plaintiff instituted this action to recover for personal injuries sustained while riding as a guest passenger in the defendant\u2019s %-ton panel truck on 28 November, 1954. His injuries were allegedly sustained when as a result of the careless and negligent operation of said truck by the defendant, it ran off the highway and was overturned.\nThe issues of negligence and damages were answered in favor of the plaintiff.\nFrom judgment entered on the verdict, the defendant appeals and assigns error.\nJ. W. Jennette for 'plaintiff, appellee.\nLeRoy & Goodwin for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0606-01",
  "first_page_order": 648,
  "last_page_order": 649
}