{
  "id": 8620623,
  "name": "ALBERT LEE DIXON v. McDOWELL INSURANCE AGENCY, a Corporation",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dixon v. McDowell Insurance Agency",
  "decision_date": "1955-09-21",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "609",
  "last_page": "609",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "242 N.C. 609"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 88,
    "char_count": 808,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.563,
    "sha256": "b61563ca7639bba9f5e8403e8e37b812e142bdb862a9019c20d5727e12a34081",
    "simhash": "1:433342a97c4751e5",
    "word_count": 129
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:51:17.837681+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "ALBERT LEE DIXON v. McDOWELL INSURANCE AGENCY, a Corporation."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR CuRIAm.\nA study of the evidence satisfies us that the Trial Court was correct in entering a judgment of nonsuit, upon motion of the defendant, and the said judgment is\nAffirmed.\nWiNBORNE and Higgins, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR CuRIAm."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John H. McMurray and Sam J. Ervin, III, for Plaintiff, Appellant.",
      "Proctor & Dameron for Defendant, Appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ALBERT LEE DIXON v. McDOWELL INSURANCE AGENCY, a Corporation.\n(Filed 21 September, 1955.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Pless, J., February Term 1955 of Mo-Dowell.\nCivil action for damages for the alleged breach of an alleged contract to procure collision insurance upon an automobile.\nFrom judgment of nonsuit entered at the conclusion of the plaintiff\u2019s evidence, the plaintiff appeals, assigning as error the entry of the judgment.\nJohn H. McMurray and Sam J. Ervin, III, for Plaintiff, Appellant.\nProctor & Dameron for Defendant, Appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0609-01",
  "first_page_order": 651,
  "last_page_order": 651
}