{
  "id": 8621445,
  "name": "A. E. WHITFIELD and Wife, MARY ELLEN WHITFIELD, v. LOUIS HARVARD and Wife, ROSA HARVARD",
  "name_abbreviation": "Whitfield v. Harvard",
  "decision_date": "1955-09-28",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "649",
  "last_page": "650",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "242 N.C. 649"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 94,
    "char_count": 882,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "sha256": "6c861616210b177fb01417985271b9f568b2685c096e30c63fd716a4c640a499",
    "simhash": "1:0031ee0836677a00",
    "word_count": 142
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:51:17.837681+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "WiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "A. E. WHITFIELD and Wife, MARY ELLEN WHITFIELD, v. LOUIS HARVARD and Wife, ROSA HARVARD."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR Cueiam.\nOur examination of the record discloses that the crucial finding of consent is supported by the evidence. This works an affirmance of the order.\nAffirmed.\nWiNBORNE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wright T. Dixon, Jr., for defendants, appellants.",
      "Woodrow H. Peterson and David J. Turlington, Jr., for plaintiffs, appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. E. WHITFIELD and Wife, MARY ELLEN WHITFIELD, v. LOUIS HARVARD and Wife, ROSA HARVARD.\n(Filed 28 September, 1955.)\nAppeal by defendants from Parker, J., at February, 1955, Civil Term of Sampson Superior Court.\nMotion in the cause by defendants to set aside a consent judgment for want of consent thereto.\nThe court below found as a fact that the defendants consented to the judgment and overruled the motion.\nFrom the order entered in accordance with the foregoing ruling, the defendants appeal. ''\nWright T. Dixon, Jr., for defendants, appellants.\nWoodrow H. Peterson and David J. Turlington, Jr., for plaintiffs, appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0649-01",
  "first_page_order": 691,
  "last_page_order": 692
}