{
  "id": 8621195,
  "name": "HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING PROJECT N. C. 12-1-A, Petitioner, v. DAISY T. JENKINS, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Housing Authority v. Jenkins",
  "decision_date": "1955-11-02",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "73",
  "last_page": "73",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "243 N.C. 73"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 142,
    "char_count": 1569,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.543,
    "sha256": "908673aba989c1e97636ccc7522d43875a99eba63733ae31a3e8832f30b3f9f5",
    "simhash": "1:88865ff95d771c98",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:50.387183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING PROJECT N. C. 12-1-A, Petitioner, v. DAISY T. JENKINS, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR Curiam.\nThe evidence, considered in the light most favorable to respondent, was sufficient to support the verdict; and it was for the trial court, in its discretion, to determine whether the verdict should have been set aside as excessive. This determination was made, adversely to petitioner. Careful consideration of the remaining assignments fails to disclose any error of law deemed of sufficient prejudicial effect to warrant a new trial. Hence, the verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Blackwell, Blackwell & Canady for petitioner, appellant.",
      "Buford T. Henderson for respondent, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA HOUSING PROJECT N. C. 12-1-A, Petitioner, v. DAISY T. JENKINS, Respondent.\n(Filed 2 November, 1955.)\nTrial \u00a749% \u2014\nWhether the verdict should be set aside as excessive rests within the discretion of the trial court.\nAppeal by petitioner from Sharp, Special Judge, May, 1955, Term, of Fobsyth.\nSpecial proceeding under Public Works Eminent Domain Law. G.S. 40-30 et seq.\nThe controversy relates solely to the amount to which respondent is entitled as compensation for the property condemned by petitioner.\nUpon trial in the Superior Court, the issue submitted and the jury\u2019s answer were as follows:\n\u201c1. What was the fair market value of the real property of the respondent, Daisy T. Jenkins, described in the Petition, as of November 1, 1954, the date of the taking? Answer: $4,500.00.\u201d\nJudgment was entered in accordance with the verdict. Petitioner excepted and appealed, assigning errors.\nBlackwell, Blackwell & Canady for petitioner, appellant.\nBuford T. Henderson for respondent, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0073-01",
  "first_page_order": 113,
  "last_page_order": 113
}