{
  "id": 8621667,
  "name": "FRED R. DENNIS v. FRANK DETELS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dennis v. Detels",
  "decision_date": "1955-11-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "111",
  "last_page": "112",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "243 N.C. 111"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 127,
    "char_count": 1278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.589,
    "sha256": "4323d82f9a5718260125ab0dacbb897a7711e0d2313c5e59c865edcf514b6618",
    "simhash": "1:1ba5955e927c023a",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:50.387183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "FRED R. DENNIS v. FRANK DETELS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Cukiam.\nCareful consideration of each challenged allegation fails to disclose that its retention in the complaint will materially prejudice defendant on the final hearing of this cause. Hence, Judge Gwyn\u2019s order is\nAfiirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Cukiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "R. L. Smith & Son and Morton & Williams for 'plaintiff, appellee.",
      "Brown & Mauney for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "FRED R. DENNIS v. FRANK DETELS.\n(Filed 9 November, 1955.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 40f\u2014\nThe denial of a motion to strike will not be disturbed on appeal when it does not appear that retention of the challenged allegation will materially' prejudice defendant on the final hearing.\nAppeal by defendant from Gwyn, J., April Term, 1955, of Stanly.\nCivil action to recover damages to person and property, growing out of a collision on 10 July, 1954, at the intersection of U. S. Highway 52 and N. C. Highway 49, near Richfield, Stanly County, allegedly caused by the negligence of defendant.\nDefendant, in apt time, filed motion under G.S. 1-153 to strike as irrelevant and redundant designated allegations of the complaint.\nAfter hearing in due course, Judge Gwyn entered an order denying defendant\u2019s said motion. Defendant excepted and appealed, assigning as error the denial of his motion in respect to each designated allegation challenged thereby.\nR. L. Smith & Son and Morton & Williams for 'plaintiff, appellee.\nBrown & Mauney for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0111-02",
  "first_page_order": 151,
  "last_page_order": 152
}