{
  "id": 8621729,
  "name": "STATE v. JOHN WASHINGTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Washington",
  "decision_date": "1955-11-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "112",
  "last_page": "113",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "243 N.C. 112"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1234,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.597,
    "sha256": "50bf3f86ba4a0f5b0a20957812ed2177535eeda7dd9e31e46ec10f84d27c10d5",
    "simhash": "1:7b5f2531883c550d",
    "word_count": 203
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:50.387183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. JOHN WASHINGTON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe defendant assigns as error the court\u2019s denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of the State\u2019s case, and renewed at the close of all the evidence. A careful reading of the record discloses there was ample evidence to carry the case to the jury.\nThe other assignments of error are to the charge. A study of the charge fails to disclose any error therein of sufficient prejudicial effect to justify a new trial.\nThere are no exceptions to the admission or rejection of evidence, which was in sharp conflict. Under a charge free from prejudicial error the jury found the defendant guilty. The verdict and judgment will not be> disturbed.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William B. Rodman, Jr., Attorney General, and T. W. Bruton, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Seawell & Wilson for Defendant, Appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. JOHN WASHINGTON.\n(Filed 9 November, 1955.)\nAppeal by defendant from Sharp, Special J., August Term 1955 of MooRe.\nCriminal prosecution for operating a motor vehicle on the public roads of North Carolina and on the streets of the Town of Southern Pines, while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.\nVerdict: Guilty. Judgment: Imprisonment for four months.\nDefendant appeals, assigning error.\nWilliam B. Rodman, Jr., Attorney General, and T. W. Bruton, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nSeawell & Wilson for Defendant, Appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0112-01",
  "first_page_order": 152,
  "last_page_order": 153
}