{
  "id": 8622626,
  "name": "STATE v. LEON TUCKER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Tucker",
  "decision_date": "1955-11-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "176",
  "last_page": "177",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "243 N.C. 176"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 883,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.565,
    "sha256": "0b92e42cc7f70053b6a91981bc5141010a7cd9b2c3ffcf52d482b8d88d2ac2f7",
    "simhash": "1:a8bdb9ad82a6ae4f",
    "word_count": 137
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:50.387183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "HiggiNS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. LEON TUCKER."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Cueiam.\nThis case involves no new question or feature requir- \u00bb ing extended discussion. We have examined the record and find no substantial merit in any of the exceptions brought forward. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.\nHiggiNS, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General McGal-liard for the State.",
      "Ottway Burton for the defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. LEON TUCKER.\n(Filed 23 November, 1955.)\nAppeal by defendant from Armstrong, J., and a jury, at September Term, 1956, of RaNdolph.\nCriminal prosecution tried on appeal from County Recorder\u2019s Court upon a warrant charging the defendant with the unlawful sale of tax-paid whiskey.\nFrom a verdict of guilty and judgment imposing penal servitude, the defendant appeals.\nAttorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General McGal-liard for the State.\nOttway Burton for the defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0176-01",
  "first_page_order": 216,
  "last_page_order": 217
}