{
  "id": 8626425,
  "name": "LYDIA S. McPHERSON v. MARY FRANCES MORRISETTE and LUCIAN MORRISETTE, Defendants, and F. T. HORNER, Administrator of the Estate of O. E. McPHERSON, Intervenor",
  "name_abbreviation": "McPherson v. Morrisette",
  "decision_date": "1956-02-29",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "626",
  "last_page": "627",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "243 N.C. 626"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "72 S.E. 2d 231",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "236 N.C. 157",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8623114
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/236/0157-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 155,
    "char_count": 1799,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.6,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.099291899483843e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4676224366748795
    },
    "sha256": "f6bbdc9ce13edb4ab23b9bd976d91899bef7ee582d7233295c9714b7edcbdd13",
    "simhash": "1:cc3ff5b0e45a3bea",
    "word_count": 293
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:18:50.387183+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "LYDIA S. McPHERSON v. MARY FRANCES MORRISETTE and LUCIAN MORRISETTE, Defendants, and F. T. HORNER, Administrator of the Estate of O. E. McPHERSON, Intervenor."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis appeal, as in the case of Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 72 S.E. 2d 231, falls under the ban of \u201cthe general rule that ordinarily an order allowing a motion for the joinder of an additional party is not appealable.\u201d In consequence, it must be dismissed.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John H. Hall for Intervenor Appellee.",
      "LeRoy & Goodrich for Defendants, Appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "LYDIA S. McPHERSON v. MARY FRANCES MORRISETTE and LUCIAN MORRISETTE, Defendants, and F. T. HORNER, Administrator of the Estate of O. E. McPHERSON, Intervenor.\n(Filed 29 February, 1956.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 2\u2014\nAppeal from tbe order in tbis case allowing a party to intervene dismissed as premature.\nAppeal by defendants from Morris, J., at December 1955 Term, of PASQUOTANK.\nCivil action by plaintiff, widow of O. E. McPherson, deceased, for judgment for money in certain sum and for the possession of certain securities in possession of defendants and for an accounting for rents received.\nFeme defendant, daughter of 0. E. McPherson, deceased, and her husband and co-defendant, filed answer, setting forth in substance a denial of the allegations of the complaint, and pray that they go hence without day, etc.\nThereafter E. T. Horner, Administrator of the estate of 0. E. McPherson, deceased, petitioning the court, prayed permission to intervene in the action for the protection of the estate, \u2014 setting forth, upon information and belief, that a large portion of the property involved in this action is rightfully the property of the estate of 0. E. McPherson, to which petitioner as administrator is entitled.\nThe court allowed the petition and granted petitioner time in which to file \u201csuch pleading, or pleadings,\u201d as he may be advised.\nDefendants excepted to the order and appeal to Supreme Court and assign error.\nJohn H. Hall for Intervenor Appellee.\nLeRoy & Goodrich for Defendants, Appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0626-01",
  "first_page_order": 666,
  "last_page_order": 667
}