{
  "id": 2219566,
  "name": "STATE v. JAMES NASH POWELL",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Powell",
  "decision_date": "1956-05-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "121",
  "last_page": "121",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "244 N.C. 121"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1204,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.529,
    "sha256": "ec0e57c72d262951117fc6443438225349cb7f0c0b39af8666cea904ac20eeb2",
    "simhash": "1:faaf8be5b20dc5cb",
    "word_count": 192
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:53:24.689887+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. JAMES NASH POWELL."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nFor the reasons stated by Winborne, J., in S. v. Cox, ante, 57, the warrant is fatally defective. Hence, defendant\u2019s motion in arrest of judgment is allowed. The State, if it so elects, may prosecute upon a new warrant or bill of indictment.\nJudgment arrested.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.",
      "Nance, Barrington & Collier for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. JAMES NASH POWELL.\n(Filed 9 May, 1956.)\nProstitution \u00a7 5a\u2014\nWarrant charging that defendant did aid and abet in prostitution held fatally defective on authority of \u00a3. v. Goal, ante, 57.\nAppeal by defendant from Williams, J., January Criminal Term, 1956, Cumberland.\nThe warrant on which defendant was tried charged, in pertinent part, that \u201con or about the 8th day of October 1955, James Nash Powell, did, with force and arms, within the limits of the said City of Fayetteville or within five miles outside of said city limits wilfully and unlawfully, did aid and abet in prostitution by soliciting and offering to procure for the purpose of prostitution against the statute in such case made and provided, ...\u201d\nFrom judgment, based on verdict of guilty, defendant appeals, assigning errors.\nAttorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Bruton for the State.\nNance, Barrington & Collier for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0121-01",
  "first_page_order": 167,
  "last_page_order": 167
}