{
  "id": 8625895,
  "name": "L. W. CLAYTON v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clayton v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission",
  "decision_date": "1957-11-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "178",
  "last_page": "178",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "247 N.C. 178"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 961,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.569,
    "sha256": "0b5756c0f97b39f43381a4d617051234ac232beec7d51cbf608fdd0d0740c11c",
    "simhash": "1:6be6cf800006913f",
    "word_count": 159
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.459804+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "L. W. CLAYTON v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe facts in this case are fully stated in the case of D. H. Tucker v. State Highway & Public Works Commission, ante, 171, decided this day, and the decision in that case controls here. It may or may not be necessary in the view of the Industrial Commission to reconsider this case with reference to any claim on the part of the defendant that the plaintiff was con-tributorily negligent. To the extent here indicated, the order of Judge Hall is\nModified and Affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George B. Patton, Attorney General; R. Brookes Peters, Asst. Attorney General and Parks H. Icenhour, Staff Attorney, for the State.",
      "Gaither M. Beam, for plaintiff, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "L. W. CLAYTON v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION.\n(Filed 20 November, 1957)\nAppeal by defendant from Hall, February, 1957 Civil Term, Franklin Superior Court.\nProceeding under Tort Claims Act for damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of an employee of the defendant.\nGeorge B. Patton, Attorney General; R. Brookes Peters, Asst. Attorney General and Parks H. Icenhour, Staff Attorney, for the State.\nGaither M. Beam, for plaintiff, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0178-01",
  "first_page_order": 220,
  "last_page_order": 220
}