{
  "id": 8627229,
  "name": "WALKER B. McGUIRE v. EULA SAMMONDS",
  "name_abbreviation": "McGuire v. Sammonds",
  "decision_date": "1957-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "396",
  "last_page": "396",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "247 N.C. 396"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "112 S.E. 321",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "183 N.C. 566",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8657320
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/183/0566-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "85 S.E. 379",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "169 N.C. 210",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8657420
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/169/0210-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 133,
    "char_count": 1464,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.523,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.145196660963924e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5799751259629422
    },
    "sha256": "9f9283a20f42a84a2fc647f3e138d1418941ff90bf7f693f9a1875fcd78de2f2",
    "simhash": "1:ad06e3bdb498a15f",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.459804+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "WALKER B. McGUIRE v. EULA SAMMONDS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThis is a civil action to recover for personal services rendered upon an express contract. The case was heard below upon motion of the defendant to set aside the judgment by default final rendered by the clerk on failure of the defendant to answer or appear or otherwise plead to the complaint within the time allowed by law after service of summons. The ground of the motion is that the judgment is erroneous, for that upon the face of the complaint the plaintiff is not entitled to judgment by default final. The court below found and concluded that the complaint states a cause of action for breach of an express contract to pay sums of money fixed by the terms of the contract and capable of being ascertained by computation.\nThe ruling below was correct. It will be upheld without elaboration or discussion on authority of the principles explained and applied in Miller v. Smith, 169 N.C. 210, 85 S.E. 379; Thompson v. Dillingham, 183 N.C. 566, 112 S.E. 321.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wm. H. Abernathy for appellant.",
      "Alvin A. London for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "WALKER B. McGUIRE v. EULA SAMMONDS\n(Filed 11 December, 1957)\nJudgments \u00a7 10\u2014\nJudgment by default final may be rendered in an action to recover for personal services rendered upon an express contract to pay sums of money fixed by the terms of the contract and thus capable of being ascertained by computation.\nAppeal by defendant from Moore (Dan K.), J., 3 June, 1957, Term, Schedule \u201cA\u201d, Civil Court of Mecklenburg.\nWm. H. Abernathy for appellant.\nAlvin A. London for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0396-01",
  "first_page_order": 438,
  "last_page_order": 438
}