{
  "id": 8627243,
  "name": "STATE v. MELVIN DEAN PICKARD",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Pickard",
  "decision_date": "1957-12-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "397",
  "last_page": "397",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "247 N.C. 397"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1505,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "sha256": "1f4c7f7a6aa052fd3e9ec3ed8f9f790ef124969c047de5d97fedd91cefb7ed77",
    "simhash": "1:ae3ccdd89c2a0b12",
    "word_count": 256
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:17.459804+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. MELVIN DEAN PICKARD"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nCareful consideration of the record and case on appeal in the light of each and all of the twenty-four assignments of error presented on the appeal fails to reveal error prejudicial to defendant. The evidence is brief, and the charge clear and explicit.\nHence in the judgment from which appeal is taken there is\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Patton, Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Wooten, Jr. for the State.",
      "Arthur Vann for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. MELVIN DEAN PICKARD\n(Filed 11 December, 1957)\nAppeal by defendant from Sink, E., J., at March 18, 1957, Criminal Term of Durham.\nCriminal prosecution upon warrant issued out of Recorder\u2019s Court in city of Durham charging that Melvin Dean Pickard on or about 13th day of January, 1957, within Durham County, did willfully, maliciously and unlawfully drive a motorcycle on the public streets of the city or on the public highways of the county, at a greater rate of speed than allowed by law \u201c100 MPH Duke Homestead Rd.\u201d etc.\nIn the Recorder\u2019s Court defendant was adjudged guilty, and fined, from which he appealed to Superior Court, wherein the jury returned a verdict of guilty. Whereupon the court ordered (1) that defendant be confined in the common jail of Durham County for a period of sixty days to be assigned to work the public roads under the direction of the State Highway and Public Works Commission, and (2) that he pay a fine of $100.00 plus cost of the court.\nDefendant appeals therefrom to Supreme Court, and assigns error.\nAttorney General Patton, Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Wooten, Jr. for the State.\nArthur Vann for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0397-01",
  "first_page_order": 439,
  "last_page_order": 439
}