{
  "id": 8620358,
  "name": "ZEYLAND McKINNEY and Wife, RACHEL McKINNEY v. H. M. MORTON and Wife, SALLIE MORTON",
  "name_abbreviation": "McKinney v. Morton",
  "decision_date": "1958-03-26",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "101",
  "last_page": "101",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "248 N.C. 101"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "67 S.E. 2d 501",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "234 N.C. 506",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8623932
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/234/0506-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 S.E. 2d 498",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "230 N.C. 746",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8632343
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/230/0746-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "35 S.E. 2d 633",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "225 N.C. 535",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8612651
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/225/0535-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1208,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.579,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20720590273795886
    },
    "sha256": "82ac1c455873ff5d5534f8b05161d5b59d4c3ed640d33a5d79e951badc94c105",
    "simhash": "1:6b32c34b14aa2f93",
    "word_count": 193
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:24.992419+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "ZEYLAND McKINNEY and Wife, RACHEL McKINNEY v. H. M. MORTON and Wife, SALLIE MORTON."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PER Curiam.\nWhere, in a processioning proceeding, the only real controversy is as to the true location of the dividing line between the lands of the petitioners and of the respondents the cause should not be dismissed as in case of nonsuit. See Cornelison v. Hammond, 225 N.C. 535, 35 S.E. 2d 633; Brown v. Hodges, 230 N.C. 746, 55 S.E. 2d 498; Plemmons v. Cutshall, 234 N.C. 506, 67 S.E. 2d 501, under authority of which the judgment of voluntary nonsuit entered, below is hereby\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PER Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. W. Wilson, for -petitioners, appellees.",
      "G.D. Bailey, W. \u00c9. Anglin, for defendants, appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "ZEYLAND McKINNEY and Wife, RACHEL McKINNEY v. H. M. MORTON and Wife, SALLIE MORTON.\n(Filed 26 March, 1958)\nBoundaries \u00a7 7\u2014\nPlaintiff may not take a voluntary nonsuit in a processioning proceeding.\nAppeal by defendants from Froneberger, J., at September 1957 Term, of Mitohell. ' .\nProcessioning proceeding for establishment of true location of-dividing line between lands .of petitioners and lands of respondents .as..set forth in pleadings filed'.\nPetitioners were permitted to submit to judgment as of voluntary nonsuit. Defendants excepted thereto, and from judgment signed appeal to Supreme Court and assign error.\nB. W. Wilson, for -petitioners, appellees.\nG.D. Bailey, W. \u00c9. Anglin, for defendants, appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0101-01",
  "first_page_order": 143,
  "last_page_order": 143
}