{
  "id": 8685642,
  "name": "THE STATE ON THE RELATION OF WILLIE ROGERS vs. ANDERSON H. WALKER AND OTHERS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State ex rel. Rogers v. Walker",
  "decision_date": "1842-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "95",
  "last_page": "95",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "3 Ired. 95"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "25 N.C. 95"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 501,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.47,
    "sha256": "f7d43494b8cc1a7c75dfd7443555a5771dc3f52a8662bc9cb3448af92ab22349",
    "simhash": "1:9b10c12a40a91fb3",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:56:07.564663+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "THE STATE ON THE RELATION OF WILLIE ROGERS vs. ANDERSON H. WALKER AND OTHERS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Daniel, J.\nThis case is in every particular like that of the State v Stephens and others, decided at this Term (Supra p. 92.) The reasons there given, induce us to affirm the judgment in this case<\nPer Curiam. judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Daniel, J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Badger for the plaintiff.",
      "Waddell and Iredell for the defendants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "THE STATE ON THE RELATION OF WILLIE ROGERS vs. ANDERSON H. WALKER AND OTHERS.\nDecember 1842.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Law of Granville County, at Spring Term, 1842, his Honor Judge Dick presiding.\nBadger for the plaintiff.\nWaddell and Iredell for the defendants."
  },
  "file_name": "0095-01",
  "first_page_order": 95,
  "last_page_order": 95
}