{
  "id": 8623598,
  "name": "MRS. GENEVA CONKLIN v. W. H. PENNY, Executor of the Estate of MRS. FLORENCE HALL, Deceased",
  "name_abbreviation": "Conklin v. Penny",
  "decision_date": "1959",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "377",
  "last_page": "377",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "250 N.C. 377"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1290,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "sha256": "52f1f68b9b97aed7f5a053a15253a69e87795eff5bbfcfc7c893ad223d0e24fb",
    "simhash": "1:235bd7fcc8a2f2aa",
    "word_count": 217
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:44:40.326881+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. GENEVA CONKLIN v. W. H. PENNY, Executor of the Estate of MRS. FLORENCE HALL, Deceased."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR C\u00fcRiam.\nA study of the Record, the assignments of error, and the brief filed by' the defendant\u2019s counsel fails to show any error sufficient to disturb the verdict and judgment below.\nNo Error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR C\u00fcRiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Claude V. Jones and Arthur Van for Plaintiff, appellee.",
      "E. C. Brooks, Jr. and B. P. Reade for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. GENEVA CONKLIN v. W. H. PENNY, Executor of the Estate of MRS. FLORENCE HALL, Deceased.\nAppeal by defendant from McKinnon, J., November Civil Term 1958 of DuRham.\nCivil aiotion .to recover for services rendered by plaintiff to Mrs. Florence Hall from 1 May 1951 until 8 June 1955 \u2014 the date of Mrs. Hall\u2019s death \u2014, pursuant to an agreement by Mrs. Hall with plaintiff that she would compensate plaintiff for such services in her will.\nThere is ample evidence to show that plaintiff performed her part of the contract, rendered valuable services to Mrs. Hall during the last years of her life, and that the reasonable value of such services was from $9,000.00 to $10,000.00.\nUpon the denial of liability by the executor and issues joined, the jury returned a verdict that plaintiff had rendered valuable services to Mrs. Hall from May 1951 until 8 June 1955 pursuant to the\u2019alleged agreement, and that the reasonable value of such services was $7,500.00.\nDefendant appeals.\nClaude V. Jones and Arthur Van for Plaintiff, appellee.\nE. C. Brooks, Jr. and B. P. Reade for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0377-01",
  "first_page_order": 417,
  "last_page_order": 417
}
