{
  "id": 8623072,
  "name": "NATHAN K. BLACKWELDER v. MARCUS LaFAYETTE HARRIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "Blackwelder v. Harris",
  "decision_date": "1960-04-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "462",
  "last_page": "463",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "252 N.C. 462"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1481,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "sha256": "17f657847bec574b3767729b391159dd950b7bba4a32327a768923b9b4c6e0a1",
    "simhash": "1:1d1065aa766487c5",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:30:54.749131+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "NATHAN K. BLACKWELDER v. MARCUS LaFAYETTE HARRIS."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR Cubiam.\nThe record shows that at the January Term 1959 of the Superior Court of Cabarrus County, this action was tried by a judge and jury, and that the jury answered the issues as the jury did at the November Term 1959. The presiding judge at the January Term 1959, in his discretion, set the verdict aside.\nPlaintiff\u2019s assignments of error have been carefully considered, and all of them are overruled. There is nothing in the record before us to justify a new trial.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR Cubiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. M. Llewellyn and Ann L. McKenzie for plaintiff, appellant.",
      "John Hugh Williams for defendant, appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "NATHAN K. BLACKWELDER v. MARCUS LaFAYETTE HARRIS.\n(Filed 27 April, 1960.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Sharp, S. J., November 1959 Term, of CABARRUS.\nCivil action to recover damages for personal injuries and damage to an automobile resulting from a collision of automobiles in the intersection of two roads.\nDefendant in his answer denied that he was negligent, alleged that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence, and asserted a counterclaim for damages to his automobile.\nAt the close of all the evidence, the court allowed plaintiff\u2019s motion for judgment of nonsuit as to defendant\u2019s counterclaim.\nIssues were submitted to the jury, which found by its verdict that plaintiff was injured and damaged by the negligence of the defendant, and that plaintiff by his own negligence contributed to his injury and damage.\nFrom judgment entered in accord with the verdict, plaintiff appeals.\nC. M. Llewellyn and Ann L. McKenzie for plaintiff, appellant.\nJohn Hugh Williams for defendant, appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0462-01",
  "first_page_order": 502,
  "last_page_order": 503
}