{
  "id": 8623594,
  "name": "MRS. ELGIE LEE BAREFOOT v. HARRY LOUIS RULNICK",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barefoot v. Rulnick",
  "decision_date": "1960-05-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "483",
  "last_page": "484",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "252 N.C. 483"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "252 N.C. 434",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8622736
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/252/0434-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1278,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6033793862113197
    },
    "sha256": "858397d4cffead4209d040458389e357f924b84a060d1f0248237d3df44b32fc",
    "simhash": "1:170248b01270a5eb",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:30:54.749131+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MRS. ELGIE LEE BAREFOOT v. HARRY LOUIS RULNICK."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Pee Curiam.\nThe burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to the denial of some substantial right. Kennedy v. James, 252 N.C. 434, . S.E. 2d . A careful examination of defendant\u2019s assignments of error discloses no prejudicial error that would justify a new trial. All these assignments of error are overruled. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Pee Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "N. H. McGeachy, Jr., for 'plaintiff, appellee.",
      "Nance, Barrington & Collier for defendant, appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MRS. ELGIE LEE BAREFOOT v. HARRY LOUIS RULNICK.\n(Filed 4 May, 1960.)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 39\u2014\nThe burden is on appellant to show prejudicial error amounting to \u2022the denial of some substantial right.\nAppeal by defendant from Williams, J., January-February Civil Term, 1960, of CumberlaNd.\nCivil action to recover damages caused by an automobile collision. Upon the call of the case for trial it was stipulated by counsel for plaintiff and defendant that the first issue of negligence should be answered Yes, and the issue of damages only should be submitted to the jury.\nThe jury found by its verdict that plaintiff was injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint, and awarded damages in the amount of $14,000.00.\nFrom judgment in accord with the verdict, defendant appeals.\nN. H. McGeachy, Jr., for 'plaintiff, appellee.\nNance, Barrington & Collier for defendant, appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0483-01",
  "first_page_order": 523,
  "last_page_order": 524
}