{
  "id": 8571547,
  "name": "STATE v. FOREST LEE FRAZIER and DELLA WILES",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Frazier",
  "decision_date": "1961-11-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "582",
  "last_page": "582",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "255 N.C. 582"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 997,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "f95c6567a152be1097d14beee0ebb6432d228a67e2ad54e64df3c0c9492cec80",
    "simhash": "1:d7fb800c5b318828",
    "word_count": 161
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:41:58.690444+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. FOREST LEE FRAZIER and DELLA WILES."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe case was tried upon evidence offered by the State. The defendants offered none. They rely upon the weakness of the State\u2019s case.\nA careful examination of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that it is insufficient to support the verdict. Hence, the motion for judgment as of nonsuit, made at the close of the State\u2019s evidence, should have been sustained. Therefore, the judgment entered below is\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General H. Horton Rountree for the State.",
      "Larry S. Moore for defendants appellants."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. FOREST LEE FRAZIER and DELLA WILES.\n(Filed 1 November, 1961.)\nAppeal by defendants from Phillips, J., at June 1961 Term of Wilees.\nCriminal prosecution upon a bill of indictment for fornication and adultery.\nPlea: \u201cNot guilty to the bill of indictment.\u201d\nVerdict: \u201cGuilty as charged.\u201d\nJudgments: Pronounced as to each defendant as set out in the record. Defendants and each of them except and appeal to Supreme Court, assigning error.\nAttorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General H. Horton Rountree for the State.\nLarry S. Moore for defendants appellants."
  },
  "file_name": "0582-01",
  "first_page_order": 620,
  "last_page_order": 620
}