{
  "id": 8571354,
  "name": "STATE v. CALVIN MEDLIN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Medlin",
  "decision_date": "1962-10-10",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "773",
  "last_page": "774",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "257 N.C. 773"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1503,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.604,
    "sha256": "3c971e2ce6193edf5e069ac1df2b20d916c8c26bfc726c004b947a5dee743533",
    "simhash": "1:563107b0bb17d0e3",
    "word_count": 232
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:02:42.075591+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CALVIN MEDLIN."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient to warrant submission to the jury and to support the verdict and judgment. Indeed, this is not challenged by defendant. Defendant assigns as error (1) certain rulings, questions and remarks of the presiding judge during the taking of evidence, and (2) certain portions of the court\u2019s instructions to the jury. Each of defendant\u2019s assignments has received careful consideration. However, none discloses prejudicial error and particular discussion thereof is deemed unnecessary. Hence, defendant\u2019s assignments are overruled.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Jones for the State.",
      "Robert A. Farris and Allen G. Thomas for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CALVIN MEDLIN.\n(Filed 10 October 1962.)\nAppeal by defendant from Burgwyn, E. J., Mareh-April Criminal Term 1962 of Wilson.\nCriminal prosecution on warrant charging that defendant, on Sunday, November 5, 1961, at 12:30 a.m., on U.S. 301, in Wilson County, \u201cdid unlawfully and willfully operate a motor vehicle upon the public streets or highways while under the influence of some intoxicating liquor,\u201d in violation of G.S. \u00a7 20-138.\nUpon trial de novo in superior court, on appeal by defendant from conviction and judgment in the General County Court of Wilson County, the jury returned a verdict of guilty, and judgment, \u201cthat the defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and costs,\u201d was pronounced. Defendant excepted and appealed.\nAttorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Jones for the State.\nRobert A. Farris and Allen G. Thomas for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0773-01",
  "first_page_order": 813,
  "last_page_order": 814
}