{
  "id": 8559498,
  "name": "STATE v. CHARLES HENRY BRILEY",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Briley",
  "decision_date": "1963-03-20",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "137",
  "last_page": "137",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "259 N.C. 137"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "108 S.E. 2d 608",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "250 N.C. 252",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8622053
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/250/0252-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 194,
    "char_count": 2299,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0035244491620538e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5395864778216799
    },
    "sha256": "a2145857c17f002041edeb0a902d0898d327db3f649c0757d6265cf1ea37229b",
    "simhash": "1:b040d358135a62a1",
    "word_count": 362
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:55:17.750134+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "STATE v. CHARLES HENRY BRILEY."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe State offered evidence tending to show that defendant was operating a motor vehicle on a public highway in Wilson County (U. S. Plighway 264) shortly after 9:00 p.m. on Saturday, May 5, 1962.\nThe State offered in evidence a certified nopy of the official record (Form DL 49) of the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, Drivers License Division, of defendant\u2019s convictions for violations of the motor vehicle laws and of the Department\u2019s actions on account thereof. According to this record, defendant\u2019s operator\u2019s license was permanently revoked on March 12, 1957. Defendant objected \u201cto the portion that is not germane to this inquiry\u201d and excepted to the admission of said record over his said objection. Nothing appears in the record indicating defendant designated what portion (s) of said record he considered \u201cnot germane to this inquiry.\u201d Hence, for reasons stated in S. v. Corl, 250 N.C. 252, 108 S.E. 2d 608, the assignment of error based on said exception is overruled. It is noteworthy that the more serious violations shown on said record constitute the grounds for said permanent revocation on March 12, 1957, to wit, three convictions for operating a motor vehicle on 'a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor.\nEach of defendant\u2019s remaining assignments of error has received careful 'consideration. Particular discussion thereof is deemed unnecessary. They do not disclose prejudicial error and are overruled.\nNo error.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorneys General Barham and Bullock for the State.",
      "Robert A. Farris and Allen G. Thomas for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE v. CHARLES HENRY BRILEY.\n(Filed 20 March 1963.)\nAppeal by defendant from Morris, J., October-November 1962 Criminal Term of Wilson.\nCriminal prosecution on warrant charging that defendant, on Saturday, May 5, 1962, at 9:05 p.m., in Wilson County, unlawfully and wilfully operated a motor vehicle upon the public highway after his operator\u2019s license had been permanently revoked. Upon trial de novo in the superior court on appeal by defendant from conviction and judgment in the General County Court of Wilson County, the jury returned a verdict of guilty, and judgment imposing a prison sentence of one year was pronounced. Defendant excepted and appealed.\nAttorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorneys General Barham and Bullock for the State.\nRobert A. Farris and Allen G. Thomas for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0137-01",
  "first_page_order": 181,
  "last_page_order": 181
}