{
  "id": 8575115,
  "name": "BILLY FRANKLIN RUSSELL v. HAZEL WHITE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Russell v. White",
  "decision_date": "1963-10-30",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "432",
  "last_page": "433",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "260 N.C. 432"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1711,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.416,
    "sha256": "a4a98a6ce4f2df1d7d8fcdee6c0336056d727195b42c9acedf92c50378e5f523",
    "simhash": "1:d122bdee8400c1b8",
    "word_count": 262
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:49:29.885963+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "BILLY FRANKLIN RUSSELL v. HAZEL WHITE."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PeR Cueiam.\nThe sole assignment of error is to- the ruling -off the cou-rt below in sustaining -the -defendant\u2019s motion for judgment as of nonsuit -at the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence.\nA -careful review o-f the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the ruling of the court below was proper and -should be sustained.\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PeR Cueiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wilson & Saintsing for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Deal, Hutchins & Minor for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BILLY FRANKLIN RUSSELL v. HAZEL WHITE.\n(Filed 30 October 1963.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Gambill, J., April Civil Session 1963 of DAVIDSON.\nThis is a civil action .instituted by the plaintiff to recover damages for property loss and personal injuries alleged to- have been caused by the negligent acts of the defendant\u2019s eon while -operating a family purpose -automobile.\nThe collision occurred on 6 February 1962 about 8:50 -a.m. at the intersection of Oo-x Avenue and Burton Streets in the City -of Tho-m-asville, North Carolina. The plaintiff was traveling east -on Burton Street and the defendant\u2019s -son was driving her oar north on Oo-x Avenue. Defendant\u2019s .son entered -the intersection on -plaintiff\u2019s right.\nThe defendant answered -and -denied negligence, pleaded contributory negligence, -and set up -a counterclaim against the plaintiff for certain medical expenses incurred by passengers in the defendant\u2019s automobile and for property -damages to her automobile.\nAt .the -close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence the court .allowed defendant\u2019s motion for judgment-as-of nonsuit and proceeded to hear the defendant\u2019s evidence on the counterclaim.\nThe jury returned ,a verdict in -favor of the -defendant, -and from the judgment entered on the verdict the plaintiff appeals, assigning error.\nWilson & Saintsing for plaintiff appellant.\nDeal, Hutchins & Minor for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0432-01",
  "first_page_order": 472,
  "last_page_order": 473
}