{
  "id": 8575676,
  "name": "IVAN EMORY FARRAR v. WILLIAM FARRAR",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farrar v. Farrar",
  "decision_date": "1963-11-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "583",
  "last_page": "584",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "260 N.C. 583"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1525,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.407,
    "sha256": "4076ed27293f8d866c49af84b67dd6b4d3d620619654bd6048e4c24499250400",
    "simhash": "1:5feccdbba33d96fb",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:49:29.885963+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "IVAN EMORY FARRAR v. WILLIAM FARRAR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe parties -are brothers. On February 26, 1960, the plaintiff accepted -the defendant\u2019s invitation to accompany \u00a1him in the latter\u2019s pickup truck to- the h-ome -of -a near relative. The -defendant entered \u00a1his tr-uck from rhh-e left, -and while- the plaintiff was -attempting to enter from -the -right, but before he was -actually in -tih-e vehicle, it moved -off, inflicting personal injuries.\nThe -evidence moist fav-or-able to- the plaintiff .permits the inference that -defendant was careless in moving the vehicle while -the plaintiff wais in a -place of danger; that the movement resulted in- some injury to tlhe plaintiff. Appropriate issues should have -been submitted to the jury. The judgment of nonsuit is\nReversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert S. Cahoon for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Jordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols, and G. Marlin Evans by G. Marlin Evans for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "IVAN EMORY FARRAR v. WILLIAM FARRAR.\n(Filed 27 November 1963.)\nAutomobiles \u00a7 47\u2014\nEvidence that defendant, while his invitee was attempting to enter the vehicle but before he was actually in, started the vehicle, resulting in injury to the invitee, held sufficient to be submitted to the jury on the issue of negligence.\nAppeal by plaintiff from Crissman, J., February 25, 1963 Civil Session, Guilford Superior Court, Greensboro Division.\nCivil action to. recover damages for personal -injury allegedly caused iby -defendant\u2019s -actionable negligence. From a judgment -oif nonsuit (entered -at the c-lo-se of -the evidence, the plaintiff appealed.\nRobert S. Cahoon for plaintiff appellant.\nJordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols, and G. Marlin Evans by G. Marlin Evans for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0583-01",
  "first_page_order": 623,
  "last_page_order": 624
}