{
  "id": 8575685,
  "name": "MINA WILKINS v. GEORGE T. WOOD, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilkins v. Wood",
  "decision_date": "1963-11-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "584",
  "last_page": "586",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "260 N.C. 584"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C.",
    "id": 9292,
    "name": "Supreme Court of North Carolina"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 295,
    "char_count": 3795,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.422,
    "sha256": "1cef3136efbbc8d40e3c123968ff4d63bd0f303a657331cb000649365b0db540",
    "simhash": "1:68881753db8737eb",
    "word_count": 645
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:49:29.885963+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "MINA WILKINS v. GEORGE T. WOOD, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nPlaintiff alleged that her injuries were proximately caused 'by defendant\u2019s negligence in that: (1) Pie caused her shoes to be removed from her feet .and concealed them so that she could not find them after leaving the table; (2) \u00a1without providing any 'assistance, he ordered her to leave the table immediately after the examination when he should have known her equilibrium was .impaired; (3) he maintained the floor of his examining room in a \u00a1dangerously slippery condition; and (4) he wilfully failed and refused to remove from plaintiff\u2019s body the lubricants which he had applied.\nPlaintiff\u2019s evidence fails either to 'substantiate these allegations or to establish a failure on the part of the defendant to perform any duty which he owed \u00a1her \u00abrising out of the doctor-patient relationship. The only conclusion to ibe drawn from this evidence is that plaintiff\u2019s fall was one of those unforeseen mislhaps which occasionally bechance and baffle the most circumspect.\nThe judgment of nonsuit is\nAffirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. H. Steed and J. W. Clontz for plaintiff appellant.",
      "Jordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols and William B. Rector, Jr., for defendant appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "MINA WILKINS v. GEORGE T. WOOD, JR.\n(Filed 27 November 1963.)\nAppeal by plaintiff from Crissman, J., March 1963 Regular Civil Session -of Guilford, High Point Division.\nAction for personal injuries. This- appeal involves only the question of nonsuit. Plaintiff's evidence tends- to -show the following facts:\nDefendant is -a practicing physician and surgeon in High P-o-int. On January 6,1958 -plaintiff, -then fifty--eight years -old, consulted him with reference to a gastrointestinal condition. He decided that a si-gmoid-losc-opic examination! was necessary ian-d his nurse, Mrs. Johnson, prepared (her for -it. Plaintiff used a step -to get up on -the examining table. Wihile sitting -on the edge of the table she -removed her undergarment. The nurse -removed her shoes- and put them under the table; her nylon hose were not -removed.\nPlaintiff was somewhat embarrassed and nervous as a result of the examination which lasted about ten minutes and caused her \u201ca little inconvenience, discomfort, and irritation.\u201d However, she was given no medicine or injections. After the examination plaintiff was told to relax on the table for a few minutes, and she did so. Thereafter, the nurse told her to sit on 'the side of the table a short time before she attempted to leave it as she would be dizzy. While plaintiff was thus sitting, Mrs. Johnson handed her a cleaning tissue and told her to use it and then 'deposit it in the waste can on the 'Other side of the room.\nPlaintiff remained on the edge of the table until she thought the dizziness 'has disappeared. Then, \u2019standing by the table, she used the tissue and put on the underclothing she had removed. Plaintiff\u2019s shoes were under the table but dhe did not see them. Without asking the nurse for her .shoes, She walked four or five steps across the asphalt-tile floor .to the waste can in her stocking feet. The lever which raised the top of the can was about an inch from the floor. Plaintiff put her right toas on this lever .and, just as the lid came up, her left foot slipped out from under her. She fell to the floor breaking her left hip and two toes on her right foot. The nurse, who. had never left the room, came to her immediately. The defendant came back into the room and said to the nurse, \u201cHow come you didn\u2019t wait on her .and how come you didn\u2019t put her shoes on her?\u201d Plaintiff told the defendant that she fell because the floor was slick and asked him if it had been waxed. He replied that it \u201chadn\u2019t just been waxed, but had just been buffed.\u201d\nAt the close of plaintiff\u2019s evidence defendant\u2019s motion for judgment of nonsuit was allowed and plaintiff appealed.\nW. H. Steed and J. W. Clontz for plaintiff appellant.\nJordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols and William B. Rector, Jr., for defendant appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0584-01",
  "first_page_order": 624,
  "last_page_order": 626
}